Difference between cheap and expensive DAC

Jan 1, 2014 at 5:51 PM Post #4 of 51
and what kind of features?

 
Different and multiple extra inputs (analog/digital) , ADC sections, more outputs (digital and/or analog, balanced outputs) , built-in preamp and/or headphone amps, multiple headphone sockets, different reconstruction filters, upsampling options, tube sections blah drone etc
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 5:08 PM Post #5 of 51
 
and what kind of features?


 
   
Different and multiple extra inputs (analog/digital) , ADC sections, more outputs (digital and/or analog, balanced outputs) , built-in preamp and/or headphone amps, multiple headphone sockets, different reconstruction filters, upsampling options, tube sections blah drone etc

 
Don't forget fancy case designs and elaborately crafted marketing literature!
 
Cheers
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 6:08 PM Post #6 of 51
Most transducers are not really good enough to reveal the faults of DAC in the first place.
 
Also human ears' limitations play a big role for this case.
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 6:48 PM Post #7 of 51
After owning DACs from $150. (used) to $6000 (new), the only difference—other than more zeros on the price, and the mumbo-jumbo the manufacturers and fan-boys love to spout—very, very little. Connectability (inputs, outputs) may differ but hardly worth the money when other solutions are readily available. Just my 2-cents worth. OK? Now, let’s take on that other pink elephant: overpriced CD transports!
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 7:06 PM Post #8 of 51
I can't even imagine any DAC cost over $100. I used to design DAC chips when I was younger. The DAC cannot be made with an all discrete design. Not only is it expensive, the quality is not competitive to a integrated design. All DAC manufacturers build their equipment by buying chips from semiconductor vendors from 50 cents to $2. The total BOM and R&D cost is comparatively low compared to R&D expense of the actual DAC chips. So, the only difference is the add-ons like power supply, power amplifier. knobs and LEDs on the front panel. I do my DAC shopping by finding out what DAC chip is being used, read the data sheet and then find the lowest price. 
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 7:41 PM Post #9 of 51
  I can't even imagine any DAC cost over $100. I used to design DAC chips when I was younger. The DAC cannot be made with an all discrete design. Not only is it expensive, the quality is not competitive to a integrated design. All DAC manufacturers build their equipment by buying chips from semiconductor vendors from 50 cents to $2. The total BOM and R&D cost is comparatively low compared to R&D expense of the actual DAC chips. So, the only difference is the add-ons like power supply, power amplifier. knobs and LEDs on the front panel. I do my DAC shopping by finding out what DAC chip is being used, read the data sheet and then find the lowest price. 

And in terms of chip architecture...any preferences these days?
 
I've heard a few different DAPs out there with a variety of DAC chips...seems like the Sabre ES9018 is a popular variety, but what difference does this really make?
 
I've heard DAPs with the ES9018 and a Wolfson side-by-side, and I can't really tell if the differences in my listening came from the DAC or the onboard amplifier of the DAPs.  Which would typically play more of a role?
 
Designing DAC chips sounds like quite the career, btw!
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 8:18 PM Post #10 of 51
What actually is the difference between a cheap transparant DAC (like the ODAC) and a expensive one?

 
One is ordinary and the other employs magic pixie dust.
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 9:01 PM Post #12 of 51
It's not expensive if you happen to know a pixie.
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 9:22 PM Post #14 of 51
Ah! But WHAT A WAY TO GO!
 
Jan 2, 2014 at 11:35 PM Post #15 of 51
NO! I'm not going back there for that again!  I don't care how much they give me, I will not be taken advantage of!
 
 
On another note..........DAC chips?
 
Those were the days...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top