tuyen
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 51
i2s via gustard u16 ddc vs built in usb. The gustard does make the sound more refined and open. Same when i used the the gustard on friends holo spring 2 dac via i2s.
No offense meant but as far as I see it there is no real non-imaginary reason silver contacts, silver power cord wiring, silver transformers, silver anything will change the sound whatsoever. "A little more conductive than copper" does not cut it.I don't want to be negative, what are your experiences with power cords, or are you just in disbelief as I was before the purchase. I personally don't believe in audiophile device pads, but I've heard power cords, but of course I don't want to convince anyone , just my recommendation.
Silver is used as a medicine, so why not for cables.No offense meant but as far as I see it there is no real non-imaginary reason silver contacts, silver power cord wiring, silver transformers, silver anything will change the sound whatsoever. "A little more conductive than copper" does not cut it.
I simply meant that if this is what this thread's come down to, it has lost my interest
Cheers
Solid core copper, something like ZMF 2k copper cables, good quality copper transformers; I have never been convinced of the superiority of silver besides cost and the whole snake oil aspect of it.Silver is used as a medicine, so why not for cables.
Silver is used as a material for contacts. Do you think that scientists have immaginary reason?
Silver do not react easily with oxygen from air or water. When it does, a product is still conducting electricity, it is classified as semiconductor. Mechanical properties are poor, so it easy goes off. Copper oxide is a very poor conductor and nobody use copper for contacts, rather a brass that have only 30% conductivity of copper.
Why losing interest? Discussion just start picking up.
Yah, I agree, I think people are going out of the way slander Pegasus as a rip-off of Ares II without having the full background. They do use the same device driver, so I think its not far fetched to believe they have overlap in design. Maybe the Pegasus is a tweaked up Ares II with some higher quality components...I can attest 1st hand because I actually own both units and have A/B test them, that to my ears the Ares II sounds better - versus just looking at the circuit board and coming to a conclusion on how it must sound.
I thought this issue was already settled though? I read on some forum or comments that Musician had licensed the design / contracted Engineers from Denafrips to build this thing. Perhaps part of their agreement is that Denafrips can't disclose this publicly, which is why you don't hear them suing/doing press releases on the subject to shame/put pressure on Musician. With such an uproar in the user community, why would they not address this? Also, it's not uncommon in China for companies to share technology, and do OEM / private label type of stuff with exactly the same design.
Aggressive users in the community seem to be more upset about this than the Denafrips themselves.
At the end of the day, I paid-in full for both DACS, I think the Pegasus sounds better without shame. If in fact, information comes out later that this was a stolen design, I might change my mind, but for now I've not seen any.
Anyhow - I'd prefer to keep the discussion more to the sound quality and enjoyment than these politics. I'm still impressed by how holographic the sound from the Pegasus is going into the my A90 and Billie tube amp. Sooo delicious
I totally agree, once the Musician states his identity that it come from Denafrips, I'm curious about the reaction of people who attack Musician.
So according to one credible audio reviewer, the Pegasus isn't even as good as an Ares II (which is noticeably cheaper). While another credible reviewer, the Pegasus is as good as the Venus (which is near top of line on the Denafrips range)...
Personally, when this topic aims to determine whether Pegasus is a subbrand or not, I can draw conclusions based on facts.
And those are ;
-Why would Denafdrips launch its subbrand and then allow a well-known reviewer to prevent its takeoff and the same reviewer later declares two Denafrips products as products of the year !?
-In proving whether or not it is a subbrand, the emphasis is on Pegasus ’inferiority to Denafrips, and when it is proven that it is superior, would it be appropriate for Pegasus owners to enter Denafrips’ threads and convince people that they were wrong and that they were could have invested their money much better by buying a Pegasus, ... I think it's below the level of decency, and I haven't seen it anywhere on this forum except in this thread.Others who do so only tarnish the high reputation of Denafrips
After all, for our end users, it doesn't matter at all whether Pegasus cheated someone there or someone is trying to ruin his business , what is important to us is that we invested our money wisely.
I am convinced that every owner of Pegasus is quite sure of that
Isn't it obvioushahaha
We need Steve Guttenberg to break the tie match.
Of course, I doubt that Pegasus can be compared to Venus, and in the opinion of people who have compared (listening to) Ares II and Pegasus, that Pegasus is more advanced (perhaps not as much as the price indicates).Isn't it obvious
Ares II is better than Venus
No business efforts, just little of brain and a common sense.And sometimes there are exclusively business efforts, as anti-advertising in order to suppress competition (I think that this thread has been dealing primarily with that effort from the beginning).
That is my impression
No business efforts, just little of brain and a common sense.
[/QUOTE
-------------deleted-----------------
And a good USB cable brings great improvements in sound, I haven't tried i2s so I can't make comparisons. I think it would be worthwhile for Ares II owners to invest heavily in cables, with bad cables they hear 70% of their AresOwners of the Ares II can never hear their dac at its best, because it lacks i2s input.
Pegasus has that and aes/ebu.