- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Posts
- 28,349
- Likes
- 32,184
Wait, Noise shaping and Noise filtering, Anti Aliasing are not considered DSP ? Those are the majority of Digital Filterings
Yes, there are pulsation errors as these codes are read and calculated with the timing by the algorithms and the Digital signal processing techniques. A values given would have to be rounded up or rounded down, if it exceed the values of the resistors to determine the Pulses. That is why R2R and NOS are the least accurate ways to process digital in Digital worlds.
Also, electrical noises, power supply ripples, temperature coefficients that related to a component precision on the scale of it operated temperatures can induce errors as an inflated values (read values + precision tolerances) then rounded down or up. This is why many DAC and AMP sound better warmed up than cold.
yes, sound is subjective. However, the differences is real, and that is why there are precision tolerances, phase noises, temperature co efficient.....those electrical engineerings parameters. All of those would contribute into processing of Binary decoding.
The reason why an SACD is better than PCM CD, was from all of this point. An already determined and no longer able to be further tempered with, directly from a studio to your room. This is a superior Digital medium....ai would take an extreme example that with PCM, applying digital EQ is possible, while DSD, you can not use digital EQ. Digital, DSD, is as close as Analog as possible. (This is exactly how the Studio want you to hear)...Then again DSD64 is the least of 2X oversampling. Which would repeat again that Non Over Sampling is less accurate or resistors ladder is less accurate. However, there are techniques to overcome that, which would also require different DSP and Errors correction techniques, which also alternate the sound performances
My points again, nothing is better, it is just how you prefer to enjoy it, the moment Human record and reproduce artificially, nothing is original. It is just that the real world is Analog, and Recording microphones is a Prime examples of that.
Many people strong point is that Analog throughoutly such as AAA will have a more natural presentation, which is true, because....the real world is analog. Why I stated Analog is the best here is because there are no algorithms errors that can take places here. Unlike the digital. Again, analogs have it own down fall, but all of that is still Analog itself.
the moment we assign quantitative values for something that is Infinite (sin waves) we already taken a further steps from being Artificially recording-reproducing to an additional Artificially construct and reconstruction of the original values
Yes, there are pulsation errors as these codes are read and calculated with the timing by the algorithms and the Digital signal processing techniques. A values given would have to be rounded up or rounded down, if it exceed the values of the resistors to determine the Pulses. That is why R2R and NOS are the least accurate ways to process digital in Digital worlds.
Also, electrical noises, power supply ripples, temperature coefficients that related to a component precision on the scale of it operated temperatures can induce errors as an inflated values (read values + precision tolerances) then rounded down or up. This is why many DAC and AMP sound better warmed up than cold.
yes, sound is subjective. However, the differences is real, and that is why there are precision tolerances, phase noises, temperature co efficient.....those electrical engineerings parameters. All of those would contribute into processing of Binary decoding.
The reason why an SACD is better than PCM CD, was from all of this point. An already determined and no longer able to be further tempered with, directly from a studio to your room. This is a superior Digital medium....ai would take an extreme example that with PCM, applying digital EQ is possible, while DSD, you can not use digital EQ. Digital, DSD, is as close as Analog as possible. (This is exactly how the Studio want you to hear)...Then again DSD64 is the least of 2X oversampling. Which would repeat again that Non Over Sampling is less accurate or resistors ladder is less accurate. However, there are techniques to overcome that, which would also require different DSP and Errors correction techniques, which also alternate the sound performances
My points again, nothing is better, it is just how you prefer to enjoy it, the moment Human record and reproduce artificially, nothing is original. It is just that the real world is Analog, and Recording microphones is a Prime examples of that.
Many people strong point is that Analog throughoutly such as AAA will have a more natural presentation, which is true, because....the real world is analog. Why I stated Analog is the best here is because there are no algorithms errors that can take places here. Unlike the digital. Again, analogs have it own down fall, but all of that is still Analog itself.
the moment we assign quantitative values for something that is Infinite (sin waves) we already taken a further steps from being Artificially recording-reproducing to an additional Artificially construct and reconstruction of the original values
Last edited: