tangent
Top Mall-Fi poster. The T in META42.
Formerly with Tangentsoft Parts Store
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2001
- Posts
- 5,969
- Likes
- 58
Over the past few months, I've bought a stereo-link USB DAC, a standalone DAC, a standalone ADC/DAC, and a prosumer-grade sound card that can be pressed into service as an ADC/DAC. I decided to run alls these DACs off against each other, with a focus on using them to improve the sound quality of low-end digital sound systems.
The first DAC I bought was the Creek OBH-14. This little DAC/preamp combo uses the same basic enclosure as the familiar Creek OBH-11 headphone amplifier. The attenuator knob is also identical between my two units. The OBH-14's preamp functionality gives you an analog and a digital input, the latter in both S/PDIF and Toslink flavors. The OBH-14 level matches the digital and analog inputs nicely, so if you hook both up to a CD player, you can toggle between the OBH-14's DAC and the CDP's built-in one with a button press. The OBH-14 has two analog outputs, one at line level and the other controlled by the attenuator on the front of the unit; cranked all the way up, the two outputs match in level. I bought this DAC/preamp to improve my main stereo system's sound and flexibility, a job it has performed admirably.
Then, a month ago, I bought a stereo-link USB DAC for listening to MP3s at work. (See this thread for my review of the stereo-link's headphone section.)
Most recently, I bought an ART DI/O and an M-Audio Audiophile 2496 sound card, to improve my home recording capabilities. I'm using the DI/O mostly as an ADC, to feed the Audiophile card's S/PDIF input because I get better results than when I let the sound card do its own sampling.
The Test
I tested the DACs alternately hooked up my main stereo system and to my best headphone system. The main stereo is a Cambridge Audio A300 integrated amp driving a pair of Sound Dynamics RTS-3s through AudioQuest Type 2+ speaker cables ($25/meter). The headamp setup is a Corda HA-1 driving Sennheiser HD-580s.
My main source was high-bitrate MP3s played through the Audiophile 2496, except in the case of the stereo-link which connected to the computer in its own way. As a side test, I hooked the two standalone DACs up to my Pioneer DV-434 to make sure the MP3 quality was indistinguishable from the original CD.
For the tests with the main stereo, I used a 20' length of Radio Shack Gold Series cable to get from each DAC to the integrated amp, since my computer is in a different room from the stereo. (I told you this was a low-end test!
) This test wasn't important enough to me to move my PC into the next room or buy a 20' pair of high-end interconnects.
My digital cable of choice was a Hosa 10' S/PDIF cable. This is cheap professional wire, not fancy audiophile wire. Many people report problems with the ART DI/O dropping out when used with inferior digital cables, but I had no problems with this $10 cable. (FWIW, the construction is remarkably similar to the thicker variety of Radio Shack Gold Series wire, except that only the contact portion of the RCA termination was gold plated -- the grip part was left with a nickel finish, which is of course perfectly reasonable.)
For test material, I chose Loreena McKennitt's "Book of Secrets", a drum-heavy work with good dynamics and several parts that tend to show up problems in playback equipment.
How'd It Sound, Jack?
I tested the stereo-link first, though my main stereo system. My immediate impression was of fairly uncontrolled, boomy bass. This is forgivable considering the price of the unit ($130). I also didn't see that problem through the Corda/Senn combo. I suppose the headphone system kept tighter control over the sound than my mid-fi stereo system was able to.
Next I tested the OBH-14 and the ART DI/O. I saw very little difference between these two DACs in my system. The only significant difference I found is that the ART DI/O showed some "texture" in some bass drums on one track, and then only when hooked up to the stereo system. I have no idea if this texture is in the recording or if the DI/O took some liberties with the audio.
Finally I tried the Audiophile card's analog outputs. The main thing I found is that it has all the detail of the standalone DACs, but none of the smooth musical power. The output seems clinical, simply playing back the audio in a very literal fashion. The sound card doesn't damage the sound, really, it just lacks the qualities expected in an audiophile stereo component. For playing back music for entertainment to decent speakers or a good headphone setup, it's better to use an external DAC than to use the on-board one. If you're just using typical PC speakers or you're using the card in a studio setting, the on-board DAC/ADC is probably fine.
Another thing I noticed about the Audiophile is that it has fairly low-level outputs, like most portable players and most other sound cards. I had to turn the Corda up to about 3 o'clock or so to get the same volume level that the OBH-14 and the stereo-link were putting out at 12 o'clock.
ART DI/O Notes
My DI/O is completely untweaked: the power supply is stock, I did not terminate the digital output, I'm using cheap 6' Rat Shack 1/4" to RCA cables, and I left the tube in since I use the DI/O for ADC. I will be trying several tweaks soon, but I didn't want to delay this review. I did try tweaking the inputs and outputs with terminators, giving the ADC path a live load while playing back, etc., and nothing changed the sound. I consider this to be a feature.
The DI/O analog outputs are indeed "hot". When I had it hooked up to my integrated amp, I had to turn the volume down to 2 to match the volume that the other two DACs achieved with the amp set to 5. On the Corda the stereo-link and the OBH-14 wanted the volume control set to 12 o'clock, but the ART DI/O had to be dialed down to 8 o'clock or so. (The '0' position on the Corda is at 7 o'clock.)
Specifications
stereo-link: 44.1 kHz 20 bit sampling, USB input, RCA output pair, 1/8" amplified headphone output. $130
Creek OBH-14: 48 kHz 24 bit sampling, S/PDIF and Toslink digital inputs, one analog input (RCA), two simultaneous analog outputs (RCA), one "direct" and one controlled by the front-panel attenuator. $350
ART DI/O: 96 kHz 24 bit sampling, S/PDIF digital input, 1/4" mono pair analog input (for ADC), 1/4" mono pair analog output (for DAC). $200
M-Audio Audiophile 2496: 96 kHz 24 bit sampling, S/PDIF digital input and output, RCA analog input and output pairs, MIDI I/O. On-board mixer and patch bay. $180
The Final Analysis
The stereo-link is a fine budget choice for people wanting to improve their PC's sound output: it has excellent bang for the buck. For your $130, you get a decent DAC and a passable headphone amplifier. The only reasonable low-end "separates" alternative I can think of is: a S/PDIF capable sound card, a DAC like the ART DI/O and a small DIY headphone amp like a CHA47 unit. If you penny-pinch, you could probably put something like that together for $250, which would give you a better system than the stereo-link. Which do you want more: to get fine sound or to save money?
The Audiophile 2496 card does not make a good entertainment device. It's fine for recording applications, but for entertainment, you'll want to add an outboard DAC to it.
The choice between the ART DI/O and the Creek OBH-14 isn't clear. If you need ADC, the only choice is the DI/O. If you need a small preamp or volume control or Toslink, the OBH-14 is the only choice. Personally, I plan on keeping both.
The first DAC I bought was the Creek OBH-14. This little DAC/preamp combo uses the same basic enclosure as the familiar Creek OBH-11 headphone amplifier. The attenuator knob is also identical between my two units. The OBH-14's preamp functionality gives you an analog and a digital input, the latter in both S/PDIF and Toslink flavors. The OBH-14 level matches the digital and analog inputs nicely, so if you hook both up to a CD player, you can toggle between the OBH-14's DAC and the CDP's built-in one with a button press. The OBH-14 has two analog outputs, one at line level and the other controlled by the attenuator on the front of the unit; cranked all the way up, the two outputs match in level. I bought this DAC/preamp to improve my main stereo system's sound and flexibility, a job it has performed admirably.
Then, a month ago, I bought a stereo-link USB DAC for listening to MP3s at work. (See this thread for my review of the stereo-link's headphone section.)
Most recently, I bought an ART DI/O and an M-Audio Audiophile 2496 sound card, to improve my home recording capabilities. I'm using the DI/O mostly as an ADC, to feed the Audiophile card's S/PDIF input because I get better results than when I let the sound card do its own sampling.
The Test
I tested the DACs alternately hooked up my main stereo system and to my best headphone system. The main stereo is a Cambridge Audio A300 integrated amp driving a pair of Sound Dynamics RTS-3s through AudioQuest Type 2+ speaker cables ($25/meter). The headamp setup is a Corda HA-1 driving Sennheiser HD-580s.
My main source was high-bitrate MP3s played through the Audiophile 2496, except in the case of the stereo-link which connected to the computer in its own way. As a side test, I hooked the two standalone DACs up to my Pioneer DV-434 to make sure the MP3 quality was indistinguishable from the original CD.
For the tests with the main stereo, I used a 20' length of Radio Shack Gold Series cable to get from each DAC to the integrated amp, since my computer is in a different room from the stereo. (I told you this was a low-end test!
My digital cable of choice was a Hosa 10' S/PDIF cable. This is cheap professional wire, not fancy audiophile wire. Many people report problems with the ART DI/O dropping out when used with inferior digital cables, but I had no problems with this $10 cable. (FWIW, the construction is remarkably similar to the thicker variety of Radio Shack Gold Series wire, except that only the contact portion of the RCA termination was gold plated -- the grip part was left with a nickel finish, which is of course perfectly reasonable.)
For test material, I chose Loreena McKennitt's "Book of Secrets", a drum-heavy work with good dynamics and several parts that tend to show up problems in playback equipment.
How'd It Sound, Jack?
I tested the stereo-link first, though my main stereo system. My immediate impression was of fairly uncontrolled, boomy bass. This is forgivable considering the price of the unit ($130). I also didn't see that problem through the Corda/Senn combo. I suppose the headphone system kept tighter control over the sound than my mid-fi stereo system was able to.
Next I tested the OBH-14 and the ART DI/O. I saw very little difference between these two DACs in my system. The only significant difference I found is that the ART DI/O showed some "texture" in some bass drums on one track, and then only when hooked up to the stereo system. I have no idea if this texture is in the recording or if the DI/O took some liberties with the audio.
Finally I tried the Audiophile card's analog outputs. The main thing I found is that it has all the detail of the standalone DACs, but none of the smooth musical power. The output seems clinical, simply playing back the audio in a very literal fashion. The sound card doesn't damage the sound, really, it just lacks the qualities expected in an audiophile stereo component. For playing back music for entertainment to decent speakers or a good headphone setup, it's better to use an external DAC than to use the on-board one. If you're just using typical PC speakers or you're using the card in a studio setting, the on-board DAC/ADC is probably fine.
Another thing I noticed about the Audiophile is that it has fairly low-level outputs, like most portable players and most other sound cards. I had to turn the Corda up to about 3 o'clock or so to get the same volume level that the OBH-14 and the stereo-link were putting out at 12 o'clock.
ART DI/O Notes
My DI/O is completely untweaked: the power supply is stock, I did not terminate the digital output, I'm using cheap 6' Rat Shack 1/4" to RCA cables, and I left the tube in since I use the DI/O for ADC. I will be trying several tweaks soon, but I didn't want to delay this review. I did try tweaking the inputs and outputs with terminators, giving the ADC path a live load while playing back, etc., and nothing changed the sound. I consider this to be a feature.
The DI/O analog outputs are indeed "hot". When I had it hooked up to my integrated amp, I had to turn the volume down to 2 to match the volume that the other two DACs achieved with the amp set to 5. On the Corda the stereo-link and the OBH-14 wanted the volume control set to 12 o'clock, but the ART DI/O had to be dialed down to 8 o'clock or so. (The '0' position on the Corda is at 7 o'clock.)
Specifications
stereo-link: 44.1 kHz 20 bit sampling, USB input, RCA output pair, 1/8" amplified headphone output. $130
Creek OBH-14: 48 kHz 24 bit sampling, S/PDIF and Toslink digital inputs, one analog input (RCA), two simultaneous analog outputs (RCA), one "direct" and one controlled by the front-panel attenuator. $350
ART DI/O: 96 kHz 24 bit sampling, S/PDIF digital input, 1/4" mono pair analog input (for ADC), 1/4" mono pair analog output (for DAC). $200
M-Audio Audiophile 2496: 96 kHz 24 bit sampling, S/PDIF digital input and output, RCA analog input and output pairs, MIDI I/O. On-board mixer and patch bay. $180
The Final Analysis
The stereo-link is a fine budget choice for people wanting to improve their PC's sound output: it has excellent bang for the buck. For your $130, you get a decent DAC and a passable headphone amplifier. The only reasonable low-end "separates" alternative I can think of is: a S/PDIF capable sound card, a DAC like the ART DI/O and a small DIY headphone amp like a CHA47 unit. If you penny-pinch, you could probably put something like that together for $250, which would give you a better system than the stereo-link. Which do you want more: to get fine sound or to save money?
The Audiophile 2496 card does not make a good entertainment device. It's fine for recording applications, but for entertainment, you'll want to add an outboard DAC to it.
The choice between the ART DI/O and the Creek OBH-14 isn't clear. If you need ADC, the only choice is the DI/O. If you need a small preamp or volume control or Toslink, the OBH-14 is the only choice. Personally, I plan on keeping both.