508Parkour
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2013
- Posts
- 18
- Likes
- 0
I was leaning towards DAC but I wanted an opinion.
Deferred Acquisition Charges are typically amortized over the life of the policy as a percentage of Estimated Gross Profits, as outlined in FASB 97. Logically this only applies to the GAAP treatment of such a policy, as the STAT treatment does not permit the capitalization and amortization of policy acquisition charges.
I was leaning towards DAC but I wanted an opinion.
We need more info.
Budget?
Assume this is for a Win PC?
For music? movies? gaming? FPS gaming?
I was leaning towards DAC but I wanted an opinion.
We need more info.
Budget?
Assume this is for a Win PC?
For music? movies? gaming? FPS gaming?
Budget would be pretty low. It's one of those situations where I want to spend $50-$75 but if it is absolutely neccesary, I can go higher. But it hurts if I do. This would be for a win/linux computer that I may hackintosh (im not sure if I can say that on this forum). Its mostly for music, secondly video editing, and I might do a tiny bit of gaming.
Budget would be pretty low. It's one of those situations where I want to spend $50-$75 but if it is absolutely neccesary, I can go higher. But it hurts if I do. This would be for a Win/Linux computer that I may hackintosh (im not sure if I can say that on this forum). Its mostly for music, secondly video editing, and I might do a tiny bit of gaming.
Deferred Acquisition Charges are typically amortized over the life of the policy as a percentage of Estimated Gross Profits, as outlined in FASB 97. Logically this only applies to the GAAP treatment of such a policy, as the STAT treatment does not permit the capitalization and amortization of policy acquisition charges.
Budget would be pretty low. It's one of those situations where I want to spend $50-$75 but if it is absolutely neccesary, I can go higher. But it hurts if I do. This would be for a win/linux computer that I may hackintosh (im not sure if I can say that on this forum). Its mostly for music, secondly video editing, and I might do a tiny bit of gaming.
Originally Posted by NamelessPFG /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Between that and Linux usage, I would actually NOT recommend Creative cards. Sure, X-Fi cards work now, but it took far too many years to get to that point, and they only have bare-bones functionality, none of the advanced stuff you'd get under Windows. C-Media chipset cards (Asus, HT Omega, Auzentech's non-X-Fi offerings) would give you a lot less trouble there, I would think.
Xonar cards work fine on Linux, but of course all the advanced DSP features (Dolby Headphone etc.) are missing; I think even on Windows they are actually implemented in software. However, what works at least works reliably, the ALSA driver is stable and also has decently low latency. There are some minor features that might not be available on Windows, like configurable DAC filtering (not that I think it is very useful), and reliable stereo upmixing on multichannel cards (on Windows, it depends on the audio API being used whether it works or not).
I have not used Creative cards for a while, but for those that were based on the Emu10k1 chip, the hardware DSP was made use of, even if not for any proprietary gaming audio like EAX. It was used for hardware mixing, sample rate conversion, tone controls (IIRC), and as a MIDI synthesizer. Additionally, Emu10k1 DSP code could be compiled and uploaded to the chip, allowing any effects if you knew how to code them (I used it to implement a parametric equalizer on my SB Live). I do not know how much support the drivers have for the Emu20k2 on the newer X-Fi cards (of which I have none), however.