stryker
500+ Head-Fier
Quote:
I found the 1.0 lacking a bit but what do I know? I can tell you that I have a homemade DAC consisting of 16 Philips TDA-1543 dac chips stacked in parallel. Now that's a great use of a NOS dac! The Ack! has just one. The builder of my DAC (which was his own personal DAC for a while) made a good point in that there is still quite a bit of error and sonic loss using this one basic dac chip. The 16-way more than makes up for it, atlhough I'm sure good sound can be had for half of that. The DAC-AH uses four in a row which is better, but I really have to question the sonic quality of a dac using just one 1543. Of course, that's only after hearing what 16 in a row will do. Even if everything else around it including battery power and and analog stage that is top shelf, the DAC itself has its limitations.
Originally Posted by Mr.Shadow I was Thinking... Any Info/Comments/Opinions on the ack! Dack 2.0 (with Hi-Res) ? for a second hand price which is around 600$ ? Thanks. Earth to Earl (Sacd lover), can you hear me ? |
I found the 1.0 lacking a bit but what do I know? I can tell you that I have a homemade DAC consisting of 16 Philips TDA-1543 dac chips stacked in parallel. Now that's a great use of a NOS dac! The Ack! has just one. The builder of my DAC (which was his own personal DAC for a while) made a good point in that there is still quite a bit of error and sonic loss using this one basic dac chip. The 16-way more than makes up for it, atlhough I'm sure good sound can be had for half of that. The DAC-AH uses four in a row which is better, but I really have to question the sonic quality of a dac using just one 1543. Of course, that's only after hearing what 16 in a row will do. Even if everything else around it including battery power and and analog stage that is top shelf, the DAC itself has its limitations.