Chord Mojo DAC-amp ☆★►FAQ in 3rd post!◄★☆
post-15201092
Post #39,226 of 40,442

GreenBow

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 6, 2015
Messages
3,646
Reaction score
1,150
Joined
Feb 6, 2015
Posts
3,646
Likes
1,150
I think Rob Watts said that optical is the reference sound. Not due to anything internal about the Mojo, but due to no noise being introduced into the Mojo. Noise from the metal cables and RFI. Noise also from noisy PCs and the USB connection. (Hence why some of use Aidioquest Jitterbug on our Mojo USB connection.)
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Matpar
post-15201134
Post #39,227 of 40,442

captblaze

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
931
Location
Blazin it up in the land of Lincoln
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Location
Blazin it up in the land of Lincoln
Posts
1,361
Likes
931
now that Poly is a much more reliable device (my experience) I find the need to use other source connections to be unnecessary. direct from SD to Mojo provides my ears with the most pleasing sound of all

and yes I do understand not everyone can justify a $700 streaming add on, but Poly has (finally) made it to the party and is welcome to stay
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: masterpfa
post-15201175
Post #39,228 of 40,442

JamieMcC

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
485
Location
UK
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Location
UK
Posts
2,217
Likes
485
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-15201367
Post #39,229 of 40,442

Totoxio

Head-Fier
Joined
May 26, 2019
Messages
57
Reaction score
37
Location
Mexico
Joined
May 26, 2019
Location
Mexico
Posts
57
Likes
37
waiting mine in a few days, then will be trying it with my Mojo through coaxial. Let you know :)
I'd recommend going optical, unless you use coaxial with an isolated USB to SPDIF converter like Schiit Eitr or similar. The reason? Coaxial, because it still uses a cable, is also susceptible to carry electrical noise from the source and pick up EMI/RFI from the air, unless it is galvanically isolated. I went that way with a complicated devices chain and I regret it. Optical is much simpler and cost effective.
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: 474194
post-15201524
Post #39,230 of 40,442

Matpar

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Messages
280
Reaction score
66
Location
Torino
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Location
Torino
Posts
280
Likes
66
I'd recommend going optical, unless you use coaxial with an isolated USB to SPDIF converter like Schiit Eitr or similar. The reason? Coaxial, because it still uses a cable, is also susceptible to carry electrical noise from the source and pick up EMI/RFI from the air, unless it is galvanically isolated. I went that way with a complicated devices chain and I regret it. Optical is much simpler and cost effective.
As a matter of fact I have an USB C to SPDIF from Cayin that hopefully will work with the X10T (it should have this sort of output implemented). But I will look into the optical options and see what happens. Let you know about the result. For sure in my humble experience, USB input is the one that TO ME is less satisfactory and, as stated already by other members, more prone to noise (EMI/RFI).

My experimental rig at the moment will be X10T as a transport, Mojo in "Line out mode" as a DAC and then a Corda Quickstep at the end as the amp. :)
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Totoxio
post-15201540
Post #39,231 of 40,442

dakanao

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
2,617
Reaction score
198
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Posts
2,617
Likes
198
I wasn't satisfied with the Mojo through USB with everything stock. It wasn't until I purchased an isolator, 2 Jitterbugs (1 sitting in an unused port of the same USB bus) and a shielded USB cable that I really started to love the Mojo.

It just makes it more analogue, more controlled treble more defined bass, more natural timbre, better separation, transient response and resolution due to the lower noise distortion, just all around more refined.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Totoxio
post-15201576
Post #39,232 of 40,442

ZappaMan

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
2,010
Reaction score
1,185
Location
dynamo hum
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Location
dynamo hum
Posts
2,010
Likes
1,185
I wasn't satisfied with the Mojo through USB with everything stock. It wasn't until I purchased an isolator, 2 Jitterbugs (1 sitting in an unused port of the same USB bus) and a shielded USB cable that I really started to love the Mojo.

It just makes it more analogue, more controlled treble more defined bass, more natural timbre, better separation, transient response and resolution due to the lower noise distortion, just all around more refined.
If I power a chromecast via usb, then use optical to the dac, would putting a jitterbug in line (between power and chromecast) help theoretically?
I’d guess not, that it’s just used to clean up data signals?
 
     Share This Post       
post-15201587
Post #39,233 of 40,442

miketlse

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 8, 2016
Messages
4,565
Reaction score
2,610
Joined
May 8, 2016
Posts
4,565
Likes
2,610
If I power a chromecast via usb, then use optical to the dac, would putting a jitterbug in line (between power and chromecast) help theoretically?
I’d guess not, that it’s just used to clean up data signals?
I doubt it.
The jitterbug web page, states that it doesn't reduce jitter, but chord users did find that it reduced electrical noise.
If you use chromecast, then you are removing electrical noise from the equation anyway, so I cannot envisage how jitterbug would add value.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: ZappaMan
post-15201597
Post #39,234 of 40,442

dakanao

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
2,617
Reaction score
198
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Posts
2,617
Likes
198
I doubt it.
The jitterbug web page, states that it doesn't reduce jitter, but chord users did find that it reduced electrical noise.
If you use chromecast, then you are removing electrical noise from the equation anyway, so I cannot envisage how jitterbug would add value.
Yeah, even though it's called the Jitterbug, it doesn't reduce jitter but it reduces electrical noise. I don't know if it'll work on the Chromecast theoretically
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: ZappaMan
post-15202161
Post #39,235 of 40,442

miketlse

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 8, 2016
Messages
4,565
Reaction score
2,610
Joined
May 8, 2016
Posts
4,565
Likes
2,610
Yeah, even though it's called the Jitterbug, it doesn't reduce jitter but it reduces electrical noise. I don't know if it'll work on the Chromecast theoretically
If you use chromecast audio, you are connecting the CCA to mojo via optical, so no electrical noise can be transferred.
 
     Share This Post       
post-15202192
Post #39,236 of 40,442

rkt31

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
452
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
1,563
Likes
452
Yes, that's the one. I was tempted myself.
I was the person who posted about xduoo x10t V1 as I am using it with HMS. Now xduoo x10t V1 has been discontinued and V2 has better format support. It is very clean transport to the point that the seller from I bought told me that it is excessively warm with mojo which I knew was good thing because a digital transport sounding warm means it has very low jitter. It is bit perfect and not due to some eq it is warm, which I checked from dsd encoded as dop into FLAC . It successfully passed dsd dop flac into HMS.
 
     Share This Post       
post-15202276
Post #39,237 of 40,442

ubs28

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
3,406
Reaction score
582
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Posts
3,406
Likes
582
I believe a while ago in this thread people were talking about a Mojo 2 coming.

Any news on this?
 
     Share This Post       
post-15202630
Post #39,238 of 40,442

joshnor713

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
1,108
Reaction score
630
Location
Seattle Area
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Location
Seattle Area
Posts
1,108
Likes
630
     Share This Post       
post-15207024
Post #39,239 of 40,442

Matpar

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Messages
280
Reaction score
66
Location
Torino
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Location
Torino
Posts
280
Likes
66
waiting mine in a few days, then will be trying it with my Mojo through coaxial. Let you know :)
Self quote, the X10T arrived, wow.



X10T as source, controlled via HiBy directly from my smartphone, then USB C to coaxial in the Mojo, then line out mode to Corda Quickstep, finally to my Audeze isine 20.

One of the most punchy, detailed and clean rig I have made so far. :)
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: tomwoo
post-15207117
Post #39,240 of 40,442

GreenBow

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 6, 2015
Messages
3,646
Reaction score
1,150
Joined
Feb 6, 2015
Posts
3,646
Likes
1,150
I would go via optical if I had the option like that. Plus I would not use an amp.

(Great photo.)

That's a great file source though, with the whole choice of connections.

By the way, I would recommend the Mojo case. The case was worth it to me, for peace of mind. I feel far more confident handling and moving my Mojo about. It seems silly, but I was always incredible tense about dropping something on the Mojo and marking it. Mojo always felt very vulnerable to damage on my desktop. Mojo in the original Chord case is stunning too. Worth the entry price just for that, and I don't ever worry about looks.
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Matpar

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 13)

Top