i personaly prefer the sound of the mojo over the schiit bimby and the wyrd 4 sound dac-2
its a tiny box of magic.
its a tiny box of magic.
But you're not hearing mojo, you're hearing whatever that third device is right?
But you're not hearing mojo, you're hearing whatever that third device is right?
Not really. That amp is quite transparent. It merely amplifies.
Hmm, Amplifier not just amplifies, it changes the sound too.
If that was not the case, then the Tube Amp, Class AB Amp, Class D, Class H Amp all should sound the same, but that's not the case.
Every one knows what Tube Amp does to the sound, same as Class AB and Class D.
Hmm, Amplifier not just amplifies, it changes the sound too.
If that was not the case, then the Tube Amp, Class AB Amp, Class D, Class H Amp all should sound the same, but that's not the case.
Every one knows what Tube Amp does to the sound, same as Class AB and Class D.
And what an amateur. Not all tubes sound alike. Not all class D amps sound the same.
So what is the tube sound?
Hmm, Amplifier not just amplifies, it changes the sound too.
If that was not the case, then the Tube Amp, Class AB Amp, Class D, Class H Amp all should sound the same, but that's not the case.
Every one knows what Tube Amp does to the sound, same as Class AB and Class D.
Not all tubes sound alike. Not all class D amps sound the same.
So what is the tube sound?
Lol, i am just saying, when you connect Any Amp to Mojo, then the sound changes, in your case may be the change is very minimal, but it changes no matter how transparent the Amp is
Chill, don't take on Ego, every one here are like buddies, but if you felt bad, then i am sorryPeace !
I first started experience this musical quality - that of being connected to the musicians, being able to perceive the instruments "talking" to one another with Hugo - and in my long career designing audio gear I have never experienced anything like it. What was really curious, was that I could play back 1930's mono recordings, and still get this effect of being drawn into the musical performance.
The very odd thing about this is that the earlier product, the first Qute, which Hugo (and now Mojo as he is Hugo's younger brother) was based upon from a design POV, certainly did not have this quality - it was extremely good from an audiophile perspective, but certainly did not have that being there sense that Hugo/Mojo has.
Why is it odd? Its because there was (I thought at the time) only a relatively small engineering change between Qute and Hogo/Mojo, but this change was revolutionary - and I just did not realise it at the time. In short its about the fact that sound is a continuous waveform, but digital is sampled. The job of a DAC is to reconstruct the sampled digital data and convert it back to a continuous waveform - and the musicality aspect is about how well the DAC creates the original continuous signal that was in the ADC. But what is crazy is how sensitive the brain is to tiny errors in this process - and by tiny I do mean very, very small, and things must be right in the time domain down to tens of nano seconds to extremely small values.
So why would minute timing errors destroy musicality for me? That I don't know, its part of the wonders of perception and being human.
More things on heaven and earth...
Rob
It improves music in general. I personally hold the view that you gain very little going over 16/44. I believe the maker of the mojo doesn't really hold a high view for DSD.
¿Mojo improves the sound of Spotify, Apple Music, FLAC files on a MacBook Pro or iPhone 6s Plus or is it just really improve with DSD files?
For Spotify or Apple Music, is an unnecessary expense?
It improves music in general. I personally hold the view that you gain very little going over 16/44. I believe the maker of the mojo doesn't really hold a high view for DSD.
what model of macbook pro? which HPs used?
i have never listened to a macbook, but i'm pretty sure the mojo would improve sound at 16/44 too. but don't bother at all if you don't use good cans