Hey guys, I've been mulling through this thread in my spare time for the last few days, still trying to figure out what is "USB optical", and is it the best transport method? The term USB optical still confuses me being that USB is an electrical rather than optical signal, so perhaps you are referring to a special dual optical cable that's shaped similar to a USB cable, but works only on an adapter box which is itself connected to the computer via USB? If so, any advantages over a standard Toslink cable?No worries. The USB optical is great if you move around different rooms as it is available in various lengths (33 feet (10M) up to 164 feet (50M)). The old school Chord posters have a DAVE in the main room and a TT2 in the office room, but only one main $40,000 Music Server. So why buy 2 $40,000 Music Servers when the USB optical is all that is needed. These old school Chord posters don't compromise Priority 1: SQ, Priority 2: Practical. They won't even settle on the most power PCs on the market (CPU power needed for real-time audio), they need a Taiko Extreme. It's also easy to roll-up and carry to another place. You may need heat sinks though as it gets warm. I'll try to post photos of my heat sinks.
With this solution, I would concentrate on the Macbook as the main playback source and use the iPhone as a controller-only. For example, you can use the Audirvana Native Core Kernel? I forget the label, but it bypasses the OS kernel? I forget, I haven't used Aurdirvana for a decade. But that should provide optimal SQ on a Mac. I think there is a RAM playback mode too? But the point is focus playback on the Macbook. Install the Audirvana Remote App on iPhone just as the controller. This way you can have the Macbook in the bedroom, run the optical to the balcony with the Hugo2 and listen to the HD650 on the balcony. Just don't trip over the optical cable and fall off the balcony if you do indeed have a balcony.
I'm not sure of your question on the Hugo2 USB socket, but it can be sensitive if an accident is involved. The fit is tight, but I still like to have the USB USPCB as a buffer. Plus it's needed with the USB optical. For SQ, you should get close to perfect neutrality since cooper wires don't compromise the signature. No colouring or artificial preservatives.
10/10 times I would spend a few hundred on a USB optical solution over some USB -> SPDIF converter. I don't like conversions, especially when it's no longer needed with a USB optical option. Plus you are guaranteed to use the Hugo2 PLL clock via USB optical input.
You need this too:
https://uptoneaudio.com/products/uspcb-a-b-adapter
Just a PCB, no cooper wires. Many impressions throughout the net that this is close to perfectly neutral too...
Here's the original post by romaz [Chord Legend] regarding the USB optical cable:
https://whatsbestforum.com/threads/taiko-audio-sgm-extreme-the-crème-de-la-crème.27433/post-631854
My mind is still on SPDIF, but if I remember anything else on USB optical I will post. I'll write a Source Take soon, so maybe my memory will recall something...
EDIT:
2+2=says it decouples because it's optical, but this statement confirms subjectively to that theory:
So some add their favorite cooper wire USB like the Sablon @$700. I wouldn't but its an option if there's a USB cooper wire flavor to your liking. I prefer neutrality so USB PCB only. Maybe the USPCB is not mandatory and you can use any USB cable temp until you are ready to try out the USPCB.
I had the confidence I can return the product anytime within 30 days if needed (YMMV):
My source is a Windows laptop playing lossless with Foobar program, and I'm currently using an Audio-GD DI-20 as a DDC with several output options into my DAC.
It's however somewhat prone to loud episodes of white noise which I could never remedy over a very long time, so ultimately I'm considering between either a USB opical solution, or another method I have noticed... I'm not sure on the exact wording or models right now but it has something to do with ethernet out to an adapter box into RCA coax, I think I noticed it on the Chord Qutest thread. For me, better always refers to the best fidelity (transparency dynamics, black background, etc.) and hopefully not too lofty cost-wise.
Last edited: