You may get flak, but not from me.
I missed the early Hugo thread but I have followed all the chord threads since.
Yes I agree that the threads do feel different now, but there are a couple of things to bear in mind.
- Like SteveHulk mentions a lot of social media has evolved during the last few years to become less collaborative, and more confrontational instead
- You also have to factor in the lifecycle of threads/forums
I will explain point 2 in more detail here.
During the past decade parts of my day job included setting up/maintaining user forums, and outsourcing engineering technical support. I started to wonder if the real world of forums like head-fi bore any relation to the 'theoretical model' of forum/thread development/life that was used to train me at work.
This question enthused me to test this theoretical model, using the weekly post data for the chord threads.
The theoretical lifecycle of a community is supposed to follow this type of curve.
The lifecycle of individual threads in a forum is expected to be similar to the right hand 3 elements of this model.
This might not be noticeable for many head-fi threads, based around short-lived products with a life cycle of 6 to 12 months.
In contrast for products with long production life cycles (for example the Mojo), many threads do seem to be a good match.
Inevitably most of the enthusiasts from the early days have moved on. After a few years, some of the early enthusiasts still remain, but many posts will be by newer owners. In addition, negative trolls who might have been swamped during the early days of the thread, are now much more visible once they are competing with fewer enthusiasts.
Given that many Chord products (and their head-fi threads) are several years old, it is inevitable that the threads will feel full of negative trolls, until new products/threads arrive.