I don't need to test that DAC, to know that the maths of the engineering implementation will yield an answer which will be the opposite of what you claim.
I don't need to appeal to authority - maths, science and engineering will suffice for me.
Surely we are, or should be, wise enough on this forum to be not poking a lion with a stick whilst we tell it to stop eating meat and eat the vegetables we've purchased because we think they taste better than meat.
Surely we are, or should be, wise enough on this forum to be not poking a lion with a stick whilst we tell it to stop eating meat and eat the vegetables we've purchased because we think they taste better than meat.
Surely we are, or should be, wise enough on this forum to be not poking a lion with a stick whilst we tell it to stop eating meat and eat the vegetables we've purchased because we think they taste better than meat
I don't need to test that DAC, to know that the maths of the engineering implementation will yield an answer which will be the opposite of what you claim.
I don't need to appeal to authority - maths, science and engineering will suffice for me.
You guys are aware that "maths" is standard usage in Britain and Europe, right? Does saying "please" give someone license to make a silly, unreasonable request?
Perhaps adding fuel to the fire, but there is Einstein’s famous dictum that not everything that can be measured is important and not everything that’s important can be measured.
One of the frustrating things about these debates is that there is no consensus on what measurements matter, how they should be taken, and their likely impact on sound quality. Without some common ground they tend to go nowhere, just a series of assertions and counter assertions.
Perhaps adding fuel to the fire, but there is Einstein’s famous dictum that not everything that can be measured is important and not everything that’s important can be measured.
One of the frustrating things about these debates is that there is no consensus on what measurements matter, how they should be taken, and their likely impact on sound quality. Without some common ground they tend to go nowhere, just a series of assertions and counter assertions.
(Posting in full knowledge this is off topic and should get deleted, don't want to spark adebat, just having a little facetious (and pedantic) fun on a Saturday morning...)
It's "maths" because there's more than one of 'em. No one studies "mathematic" do they?
I think it’s several things. 1) the DAVE is pricey and too expensive for many, so trashing it makes one feel better for not buying it. 2) the DAVE has been getting amazing reviews since it came out and is always on reviewers best of lists. That makes the DAVE a target, as people like to see the mighty fall. 3) Rob is omnipresent at conferences, so he is seen as some sort of authority figure. He’s also a bit arrogant, if we’re being honest. That makes his products an easy target for people to want to take down. 4) The DAvE measures poorly in ways that ASR deems important. The cult drinks that Kool-Aid and trashes the DAVE.
I personally love my DAVE and appreciate Rob interacting with our community. I just can see why others want to attack it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.