ZappaMan
Headphoneus Supremus
Hd800s sound really good with Dave. The orb/Neil young …..
Last edited:
What's also surprising is the fact that crossfeed on Dave has much more profound effect.
I'm not sure exactly why this is happening.
On TT2 and also hugo2 crossfeed wasn't changing that much. Actually I preffered it to be off everything was squashed together and the depth was not as clear as it is on Dave.
With Dave crossfeed is huge. I mean the image really is more upfront you. The depth and instrument placement is completely changed - of course assuming that recording has it.
With classical music I'm like 99% of the time using crossfeed 3.
My guess why this is happening is that:
- high frequencies are more extended on Dave than TT2/hugo2
- better clarity and overall small nuances are clearer on Dave especially in higher frequencies
- as we know a lot of information about space and placement of sounds are contained in high frequencies
As far as I know implementation of xfeed is exactly the same on every chord dac.
So it's really interesting to see how much of a difference you can still hear. In my opinion that's the reason why dark sounding DACs have problems with overall soundstage.
It would be interesting to hear @Rob Watts view on why there is so much difference in crossfeed between his DACs - at least to my ears.
That's a tough one. I think the power upgrade for the DAVE has made the biggest improvement overall, but the MScaler was a necessary improvement to the DAVE as well. Perhaps, without the MScaler, the DAVE power upgrade would be less pronounced because it's also highlighting the benefits of the MScaler...Would you recommend the Farad3 or Mscaler for a solo Dave? Which one gets more benefit? Thanks
I'm down in the South West, but cannot physically accommodate the DC4, so would be a wasted journey!!Hey guys, which of you is closer to me? (I am Leicestershire) If you offer coffee I’m very happy to get in my car and bring my Sean Jacobs version.
No. The requirement for three power sockets and three cords is the downside here with the Farad3 solution. This can be difficult to accommodate and expensive to set up if you like to use high end cables. For my purchase I picked up three of Farad's own power cords and will experiment later with my own cables to see if any further gains can be made.Does the Farad Super3 power supplies for the DAVE come with power cords included?
No. The requirement for three power sockets and three cords is the downside here with the Farad3 solution. This can be difficult to accommodate and expensive to set up if you like to use high end cables. For my purchase I picked up three of Farad's own power cords and will experiment later with my own cables to see if any further gains can be made.
Try also some shirley horn ‘yesterday’ just downloaded her collection.Lol ever since i got HMS & Dave, i'm hunting Redbook CD's to Rip myself.. i only want original 44/16 content as it just sound better compared to most remaster and MQA stuff
Thanks for the response. I was reading on Farad's site and saw no mention of power cords being included and wanted to be sure.No. The requirement for three power sockets and three cords is the downside here with the Farad3 solution. This can be difficult to accommodate and expensive to set up if you like to use high end cables. For my purchase I picked up three of Farad's own power cords and will experiment later with my own cables to see if any further gains can be made.
Did you find this pairing good? Do you remember if you retained transparency?I've been driving my Tannoy Canterbury GR speakers directly from the DAVE RCA outs for some time now. They are 8 Ohm nominal 5 Ohm minimal impedance. As long as you don't listen very loudly and/or do a lot of digital EQ (thus eating up the headroom), you'll be fine. I'm expecting a Benchmark AHB2 within a few weeks, so hopefully I won't lose much in terms of transparency while gaining more headroom.
There's a bit more space in-between in the mids and up and the Dave will be on the leaner side if the chain isn't optimized so crossfeed is more perceptible over tt2/Hugo 2.What's also surprising is the fact that crossfeed on Dave has much more profound effect.
I'm not sure exactly why this is happening.
On TT2 and also hugo2 crossfeed wasn't changing that much. Actually I preffered it to be off everything was squashed together and the depth was not as clear as it is on Dave.
With Dave crossfeed is huge. I mean the image really is more upfront you. The depth and instrument placement is completely changed - of course assuming that recording has it.
With classical music I'm like 99% of the time using crossfeed 3.
My guess why this is happening is that:
- high frequencies are more extended on Dave than TT2/hugo2
- better clarity and overall small nuances are clearer on Dave especially in higher frequencies
- as we know a lot of information about space and placement of sounds are contained in high frequencies
As far as I know implementation of xfeed is exactly the same on every chord dac.
So it's really interesting to see how much of a difference you can still hear. In my opinion that's the reason why dark sounding DACs have problems with overall soundstage.
It would be interesting to hear @Rob Watts view on why there is so much difference in crossfeed between his DACs - at least to my ears.
In theory the RCA output from Dave is slightly better than XLR but in practice I use XLR from my Dave to my Pass Labs power amp because that is a fully configured balanced design, If you use the XLR output then I have found a cheap pro cable such as the Belden 8760 to be about as good as it gets.Thinking of buying the AHB2 again. This time pairing with Dave instead of TT2. Do I still use XLR interconnects to hook them up? Thanks.