There are any number of beneficial things that could be happening inside those devices - from reducing various types of noise, to changing the jitter profile, to cleaning up the 5V USB power signal, etc. It's hard to say which of these aspects may be contributing to sonic improvements. And each system the device might be used in has its own strengths/weaknesses in those various attributes... so the result will vary from one setup to the next.
Studio applications with complex setups, where everything has to be synchronized to function properly together. That is by far the older and more "traditional" application, whereas audiophile use at home is a relatively new development.
You are right: it is a three step improvement process.
It would make sense to make a distinction between word clocks, reclockers etc. Anyways, the whole discussion was about the SQ improvement using a USB reclocker (like the Ideon Time/ LHY UIP).
The features of the Time reclocker are:
Separate, electrically stable USB and coaxial (SPDIF) inputs
Superlatively sized power bank, hand-made audiophile transformer
Linear, triple-stage, ultra-low noise, stabilized, power supply, with separate lines to different circuits.
Low esr, audiophile (silk) capacitors throughout;
Proprietary, femto clock re-clocking circuit on an upgradable platform;
Phase correct restitution and vanishingly low jitter.
USB output: ultra-stabilized with signal boost, high power (2.5S / 5V rail), easily drives any load
The above features/ functionalities have major impact on the Cengrand’s performance (which one specific I cant tell). I suspect the UIP to do more or less the same. And yes, the Time is more than just a traditional external clock.
I think the main thing the LHY UIP is providing in this application is galvanic isolation from a computer / music server that doesn't have isolation on the USB outputs. So less digital noise is being transferred to the DAC.
Let your ears decide.. @Lucus your statement is false - a clock signal can be improved through an external clock (reclocking) on a single base/ device as well.
I can only confirm everything @Vincent_Amsterdam says.
I have lhy uip + lhy ock-2 and the sound quality increase is significant and clearly and distinctly audible from the first seconds.
I can only confirm everything @Vincent_Amsterdam says.
I have lhy uip + lhy ock-2 and the sound quality increase is significant and clearly and distinctly audible from the first seconds.
it would be even difficult for me to say what gives a greater increase to the sound. LHY uip alone or ock-2 as an addition to uip.
and perhaps I would lean towards the second variant. Apparently the clock inside ock-2 is much better than what is standard ocxo in most of LHY devices.
All CG inputs are of high quality.. but also depending on your source that may be optimized for one or another. As claimed in previous posts: the USB signal can be sanitized by reclockers etc. Furthermore: try and pick your preference..
But what do you buy for reclocker and LHY uip.. as soon as the Cen Grand streamer comes out you will be forced to sell them both since it certainly won't connect to USB and won't have the input for the reclocker...
But what do you buy for reclocker and LHY uip.. as soon as the Cen Grand streamer comes out you will be forced to sell them both since it certainly won't connect to USB and won't have the input for the reclocker...
Obviously my "prediction" is dictated by the fact that the Cen Grand streamer will be connected to the Cen Grand DAC with its proprietary connection so whether the USB is there or not it will be useless. And yes, I don't think the streamer will have a connection for an external clock, but that's just my prediction...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.