Let me preface further observations by saying I am a 65 year old product of the Rock & Roll era, with many high decibel concerts under my belt. For that reason, my hearing, especially in the high frequency region leaves something to be desired. I have several other Amps and a small collection of HPs. But the LC is my first Amp with balanced capabilities.
That said, my first listening session with the LC was using my HIFIMAN HE400S headphones in SE configuration. Using the RCA unbalanced inputs out of my Schiit Modi 2 Uber DAC.
Directly out of the box, the LC sounded as good, but no better, than the other amps I own. I had no preconceived notions that I would find otherwise. I am of the opinion that any well designed Amp, in this day and age, will sound sonically transparent. I found this to be the case with the LC.
My second listening session featured the LC driving my Sennheiser HD650 headphones in balanced configuration, using cables purchased on amazon. My initial opinion, as stated in my posting above, is that the 650s sound a bit more lively in the balanced configuration driven by the LC. This is a very unscientific finding, and could very well be due to "wishful thinking" on my part.
My reasoning in purchasing the LC was to provide balanced capability in driving my HD650s, HD800s, and soon my HE400S in balanced configuration. I have read the pros and cons of balanced topology and want to reach my own conclusions on the subject. For me, it's very early in the game . So, the jury is still out on the matter.
Well written. Recent events have torn me away from a strict Objectivist point of view though, and I'm looking forward to experiencing the Cavalli vs. my Burson and Benchmark. I'm really looking forward to the experience!