Bumping this thread for a few positive comments about a non-Andromeda Andromeda, the Andromeda S, which I purchased direct from Campfire Audio-their second hand market site-perhaps about three years ago. I love it and have an emotional connection to it-a sad family loss that I cannot ever forget-so selling the Andromeda S is out of the question, and very much hope it lasts me a lifetime.
I love how it's balanced, top to bottom, utterly coherent despite "deviations" from most "experts" graphs targets. I enjoy these targets at times as a reference, but especially with my Andromeda S they do not tell the whole story. I remember being very, very pleased when I first listened to it, immediately fitting JVC Spiral Dots++ to it. Nowadays I am so used to it it is no longer a "shocking" revelation, but it remains a compelling, always convincing musical experience.
The S version is the only Andromeda I have ever listened to-haven't heard the "real," OG one, nor the 2019, 2020, Solstice, Emerald Sea, or latest Ponderosa (whether some of these are meant to be "true Andromeda" models by Campfire Audio, I cannot state.) Because I have come to enjoy it and appreciate more and more (rather than less, because it's supposed to be "outdated," and not "in" according the elite audiophile groupthink in charge of how good earphones are supposed to sound like), I cannot see myself even trying any other models in the "Andromeda" vein from Campfire Audio.
Things to note: Andromeda S do "disappear" in the ears, meaning they are not uncomfortable, but weight more than the others due to the stainless steel shell. So some tips may slip a bit off your natural-or preferred-position. This may account for how many find it perhaps too smooth in the highs, too "bassy" (not counting the output impedance matter, which still is a big factor), etc. With my preferred ear insertion on my unique ear canal and chosen tips-right now using Spinfit W1, though the Spiral Dot++ always sound good-it is very, very clear on top, and superbly airy. As soon as the Andro S angle or depth changes, it greatly affects airiness and the whole signature-which happens with many other IEMs, to be sure, and it's why one should take other "experts" impressions and graphs as loose guides, rather than "factual" statements (only you know how your ear canal works, what insertion depth is best, etc.-the "experts" do not take into account how *you* hear the reviewed IEM, nor your personal preferences.) So I would highly recommend my discontinued Andromeda S to others, but be mindful that it's picky about how it sits on your ear and eartips-not only output impedance!
Other CA models I have, in order of acquisition:
-IO (much hated by the good audio taste masters-amazing treble extension, unique experience)
-Mammoth (just a bit less despised by the same masters than IO, but I love it's upper mids, and the lower treble is actually quite nice)
-Jupiter, which I love and still use a LOT because of it's unique sound and lovely air at the top (I *think* even more air than Andromeda S)
-Atlas-a *superlative* IEM, with an amazing WOW factor, often unfairly described as a mere bass cannon? GREAT treble, quite normal sounding mids despite them not being the focus. These also are ones I cannot imagine in any way getting rid of. I do not understand "drive flex," and cannot state that I have experienced it with the Atlas-I would suggest to others to give this IEM a chance, rather than pay too much mind to that common complaint I so much read about.
(I may "have" the Holocene as well soon, but it was supposed to ship on March 15, and it never did. Was given the chance by Drop to cancel, and may do so if it keeps getting delayed. But very interested in owning it, especially at $379.)
All in all, do not understand the hate for this company, and am happy for the many, many hours of musical enjoyment Campfire Audio has brought to my life. Yes, I also love other brands, and understand "neutrality" and graphs. But all my CA IEMs have brought something special/unique to my collection, and I do not regret one bit any of my purchases so far.
On an unrelated, related note: anyone knows how the newer Ponderosa compares to Andromeda S (or other "real" Andromeda models), and the Cascara to the Atlas? I highly doubt the Cascara beats the Atlas, but was wondering if the Ponderosa is a "true Andromeda" on a budget, or if it's different enough that it's worth owning on its own.
(No offense intended with my comments-I respect reviewers as well, but elitism and mocking others for liking what they like *always* rubs me in the worst of ways.)