909
Organizer for Can Jam '09
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2004
- Posts
- 3,283
- Likes
- 11
yeah, $874 sounds way too good to be true.
Originally Posted by vcoheda /img/forum/go_quote.gif $1,175 brand new. that's a very good deal. |
Originally Posted by daltonlanny /img/forum/go_quote.gif Guys, I still have the Saturn, I am just very curious on how well the Cambridge 840c stacks up against it. I ordered one from Audio Advisor, which has a 30 day return policy, so I figure there is nothing to loose, except shipping. Unfortunately, its on back order at the moment. I enjoy comparing the various cd players out there, and I do hope some of my findings help others out. Thanks for your kind words, ASR, I appreciate them. |
Originally Posted by cyanbomb /img/forum/go_quote.gif The 840C was extremely detailed, almost obsessively so, and will probably suit your tastes if you like analytical music. (Again, this is just conjecture, because it might sound different on your setup). We found it too cold and clinical for our tastes, and after repeated listenings, concluded that it was extremely competent, as in it did everything it was supposed to, but.... I don't know how to put it.... I guess I would say it had no "smile factor". |
Originally Posted by cyanbomb /img/forum/go_quote.gif My father and I had the chance to bring home a Cambridge 840C for extensive listening on our sound system. I already own a 640A, which I'm very happy with (for the price). We also brought home a Musical Fidelity A5, which we auditioned together with the 840C and 640A. The 840C was extremely detailed, almost obsessively so, and will probably suit your tastes if you like analytical music. (Again, this is just conjecture, because it might sound different on your setup). We found it too cold and clinical for our tastes, and after repeated listenings, concluded that it was extremely competent, as in it did everything it was supposed to, but.... I don't know how to put it.... I guess I would say it had no "smile factor". We ended up picking the Musical Fidelity for the expansive soundstage and what we felt was increased musicality. One needs to keep in mind that the test system is quite lean on bass already, so the 840's analytical sound was probably not such a wise choice. I can see the 840 bringing welcome detail to a warmer setup though. Hope that helps! PS: Our test setup was: 1) Supra EFF-I Interconnects, QED RCA connectors into: 2) Parasound P/LD-1500 Line Drive Amplifier (Preamp) 3) Supra EFF-I Interconnects, QED Balanced connectors into: 4) 2 x Parasound HCA-2200 Ultra High Current Monoblocks. Bridged. 5) Supra Ply 3.4/S Loudspeaker Cables into: 6) Vandersteen Model 3 Loudspeakers (3-way, Floorstanding) |
Originally Posted by Asr /img/forum/go_quote.gif I thought the same thing of the 640C V2. Apparently these upper-level CA CDPs are just refinements of it and don't stray far from CA's house sound. Not that there's anything wrong with that. |
Originally Posted by milkpowder /img/forum/go_quote.gif Thanks Cyanbomb. It's interesting that you found the 840c leaning towards analytical. I read a review of the 740c which also said it was pretty detailed and would match well with a system which needed a bit of extra sparkle. Maybe the Cambridge Audio sound is generally very neutral and detailed? |