Quote:
In regards to recessed mids on heritage Klipsch,that is the one thing i don't find my Cornwalls to have.
Haha, you caught me generalizing things!
I would say Cornwall is still a little bit mid recess, the gents who bought mine said he would use tone control a little. Sorry, mate, I am "British sound" digger, so they may spoil my MF-hungery.
BTW, I found many rappers put good mastering albums, Kanye is one, 50 cents is another, early Eminem. And some supposed to be sound artist has so bad recording, yes, I am talking to you Adele. Her 21 is just so bad, I always thought her recording should be very good. So when I listen to them in my Sony x-1051, I thought my MP3 format is bad. One day, I put her 2 albums in CD changer and listened them. Holy ****t, 21 is so bad, stitched sound and off balanced sound stage. Since I couldn't bear it, I googled online, gees, many people complaint about it. So this is an example how modern mastering ******** things up. End of rant.
@Scottie, educate me with those questions,
Is open-buffer speakers one of dipolar design?? I think it is, it's just a dynamic dipolar speakers. Why the ****** they put so many name on one thing.
Another one: Do the speakers in concert influence people's taste??
I think this is one big questions, welcome everyone to chime in!!
I raise this question since many review would describe speakers vivid, live, accurate etc. Did they compare the sound to the recording gears or live concert gears? suppose there are a band B, a review R, one pair reference speaker A (B's album was finished with A), another speakers C (which was reviewed by R). So how could R say C is accurate, live, vivid etc? I know flat response etc, but they are not everything. If a rock band always put JBL speakers in their concert, could any reviewers find dark speakers vivd, live, accurate playing this band live album?? Haha, I find many old R'nR people like JBL speakers.
BTW, I am not musician or audio major. so please forgive my ignorance or idiocy!!!