I've had enough time with my 2023 3X GT to share some thoughts. I stand by the idea that musically it is NOT an improvement in stock form over an older GT in mod'd form. I get that's not really a fair comparison, but I think it is important to firmly establish my opinion that this new amp is NOT a sea change of some sort. Now, once I dropped in all my non-Burson op-amps we got back to a level playing field of comparison. And frankly I heard the BIG step in the right direction replacing all those Vivids...which is what I experienced the first time I did it on my old 3X GT. So to be clear, the new unit benefits from op-amp swaps every bit as much as the old unit did (and I consider that very VERY substantial). You really should roll op amps to get the most out of owning a 3X GT from any year.
So now we are down to going on audio memory between two mod'd 3X GTs. Here's what I have to say: The 2023 version is definitely NOT a big jump. And in totally subjective terms, for what I feel I can perceive (and remember) it would be a bit more separation in instruments and a slightly more holographic effect to the stage. On the other hand there may be a modest step back in the lower end by a skoosh. Lachlan talked about this in his review as a "leaning" effect due to the SP modules doing their thing to clean up the power and that separation cleans up the bass, if you well. If you like ever higher levels of resolution you'd be fine with it. But I did like the warmth I had dialed in on my old 3X GT. So one thing I did after my comparisons was roll to a different set of pads I own for my VC's that warmed them up just a touch, and that felt like I was back closer to the old 3X GT on the lower end "oomph". The net effect is a little more detail and stage, a drop less weight to the bass. If I had to quantify it, I would say 3 to 5 points on a 100 point scale. But that's a "subjective" quantification and by no means makes it "better" unless you like every last drop of that.
It's possible there is still some break-in to do here as I have about 100 hours on the new unit. Time will tell what the SP2 modules bring to the experience and I am sure I will get them. Why? Because I need a 12 step program for this hobby.
I stand by my previous comment that there is a very different range in volume in my new unit. About 25 spots higher needed for the same loudness. And, I even find myself using HIGH gain now for some albums to really get the sense of drive I want. I never used HIGH gain on my old unit. Again, I see this as a positive for finer tuning of the listening experience. It's interesting that Lachlan did not mention this at all in his review. Could be my sample? Who knows. I am open to the criticism that without really matching the volume objectively (say 26 position on both units from memory), that my extra step of "finding" the comparable volume on the new unit at say 49, may inject error into the overall comparison effect.
Bottom line for me is the upgrade is sort of "meh". Perhaps the SP2's will be the bigger perceived change in the right direction, although if the sound gets even leaner then I would not be thrilled. It's possible a fresh re-do of where I am using my op-amps and in what combination could create a new eureka moment. I'll play with that next by adding back my V6 Classics at the voltage stage and see what happens. Bear in mind almost all of my listening is classic rock and country. It's possible other genres produce a more significant delta between the units that would be subjectively favorable.
Do I have buyer's remorse? No. But I don't have buyer's joy either from this change in my chain. It's subtle and it's slightly mixed in its effect.
On down the rabbit hole....