Bitrate Preference?
Jul 18, 2008 at 3:07 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 37

V3lier

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Posts
40
Likes
0
What bitrate do you guys prefer when encoding? I recently started getting all my albums up-to-date in 320kb because I'm planning on buying new iems and I don't want the low bitrates to ruin my new experience lol.
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 3:11 AM Post #2 of 37

BigEat

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Posts
606
Likes
10
ALAC or WAV (Lossless)
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 3:16 AM Post #3 of 37

ClieOS

IEM Reviewer Extraordinaire
Joined
May 11, 2004
Posts
20,329
Likes
10,024
Location
Mid Johor, Malaysia
Due to my DAP's limitation, either >192kbps LAME mp3 or 135~215kbps VBR wma. Both sounds fine to me.
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 3:55 AM Post #4 of 37

Scott549

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 30, 2008
Posts
436
Likes
11
I use the Lame mp3 encoder at the V0 setting, which gives me 200+ kbps VBR files. They sound really good; doubtful I could distinguish lossless for 90% of my music. In a few years mp3's will no longer be necessary, though, I would guess.
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 6:05 AM Post #7 of 37

krmathis

Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Posts
34,761
Likes
76
Variable bitrate here, anything between 2kbps and ~6470kbps.
Apple Lossless to be specific...
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 6:29 AM Post #8 of 37

ianmedium

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Posts
4,302
Likes
172
WMA at around 320(it varies but is never lower than 306!) I find this gives exceptional sound through my sony NWZA826 and ety er6i's
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 10:26 AM Post #10 of 37

steviebee

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Posts
2,717
Likes
13
FLAC or OGG q8-10.
Occasionally 320 VBR MP3 and even more occasionally WMA Lossless.
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 11:16 AM Post #11 of 37

lewislink

Banned
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Posts
1,507
Likes
10
For larger capacity players, 4 to 8GB, using OGG@500Kbs which equals the highest Q level. For smaller capacity players, 128 to 512MB, using WMA@64Kbs. WMA@64 is outstanding for its quality of sound.

Some day lossless will get used, though.
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM Post #12 of 37

Agnostic

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Posts
1,143
Likes
10
For Ipod use lame V0 (around 230Kbps vbr)
For home use I switched to FLAC. No reason to stay lossy with the current low storage prices.
 
Jul 18, 2008 at 12:27 PM Post #13 of 37

LnxPrgr3

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 23, 2008
Posts
258
Likes
11
lame -V0

Lossless has a shot at sounding better, but -V0 is pretty far up the diminishing returns ladder.

I doubt it or 320kbps would ruin the experience
smily_headphones1.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top