Tiemen
Headphoneus Supremus
A fellow headfi-er asked me about the differences between the Beyerdynamic DT770/80 Pro and the DT 770/2005 consumer edition.
I replied, and thought is might be a good idea to share it with you all.
The bass on the DT 770 Pro gave me sometimes the idea that it's leading a life of it own. Not ingrated in the music. The bass annoyed me a lot of time.
The bass on the DT 770/2005 is quite different.
It's integrated, tight and quick. I think it's one the best basses I ever heard in the closed cans I auditioned so far.
Mids on the 2005 consumer edition are full, vocals upfront. Nothing is recessed. But it's not warm either.
The Pro sounds a bit warmer, due to the overwhelming bass, and friendlier treble.
The treble is what bothered me the most on the 770/2005. There's way too much treble for my taste.
Therefore the 2005 sounds bright. Treble is harsh, sibilant and extended. Burn-in didn't help at all.
Soundstage on the 2005 is much wider and airier than the pro/80.
The 2005 is very detailed, they let you hear everything what's going on on a recording. The good and the bad.
If the 2005 were not so bright, I would prefer them over the Denon D2000.
So, the DT770/2005 will for sure be an upscale on the HiFi ladder, if you can handle their brightness.
IMHO, that is. With my ears, with my gear, and I'm not a trained reviewer.
I replied, and thought is might be a good idea to share it with you all.
The bass on the DT 770 Pro gave me sometimes the idea that it's leading a life of it own. Not ingrated in the music. The bass annoyed me a lot of time.
The bass on the DT 770/2005 is quite different.
It's integrated, tight and quick. I think it's one the best basses I ever heard in the closed cans I auditioned so far.
Mids on the 2005 consumer edition are full, vocals upfront. Nothing is recessed. But it's not warm either.
The Pro sounds a bit warmer, due to the overwhelming bass, and friendlier treble.
The treble is what bothered me the most on the 770/2005. There's way too much treble for my taste.
Therefore the 2005 sounds bright. Treble is harsh, sibilant and extended. Burn-in didn't help at all.
Soundstage on the 2005 is much wider and airier than the pro/80.
The 2005 is very detailed, they let you hear everything what's going on on a recording. The good and the bad.
If the 2005 were not so bright, I would prefer them over the Denon D2000.
So, the DT770/2005 will for sure be an upscale on the HiFi ladder, if you can handle their brightness.
IMHO, that is. With my ears, with my gear, and I'm not a trained reviewer.