Beta 22 differences .... What gives ?
Jun 14, 2010 at 5:14 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 31

downsize

Member of the Trade
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Posts
898
Likes
14
From everything I have read on the forums, most everyone considers the B22 to be the ultimate solid state amplifier. I heard one at a meet once, and was very, very unimpressed. But other members who were there, assured me it was a poor example of a Beta 22.
 
By question is, if a person decides to build a 3 board, active ground B22, and uses good wire, and chassis connectors, what else would the builder need to consider to make sure he gets the sound everyone ultimately praises as the best ?
 
Jun 14, 2010 at 7:41 PM Post #5 of 31

 
Quote:
From everything I have read on the forums, most everyone considers the B22 to be the ultimate solid state amplifier. I heard one at a meet once, and was very, very unimpressed. But other members who were there, assured me it was a poor example of a Beta 22.
 
By question is, if a person decides to build a 3 board, active ground B22, and uses good wire, and chassis connectors, what else would the builder need to consider to make sure he gets the sound everyone ultimately praises as the best ?


what was the source and cans?   any reasons given why it was a poor example?
 
as long as the amp was built per spec, biased properly, noise free, and obviously working, i doubt any wire or routing would change your mind.
 
Jun 14, 2010 at 9:53 PM Post #6 of 31

 
Quote:
 

what was the source and cans?   any reasons given why it was a poor example?
 
as long as the amp was built per spec, biased properly, noise free, and obviously working, i doubt any wire or routing would change your mind.


Well .... This was a situation where everyone was trying to be polite, and not offend the owner. Unfortunately this means I don't have any real answers to your questions. Cans were Hifiman planars.
 
Jun 14, 2010 at 10:00 PM Post #7 of 31
Time for you to hear another Beta22 off a good source, with good quality music and with good headphones.  Also, as those Hifiman planar headphones are EXTREMELY inefficient, a using low gain won't be too much fun, or perhaps you just didn't like the headphones (I personally didn't, but I'm a Grado fan) 
 
Jun 15, 2010 at 12:00 AM Post #8 of 31
I agree with the comments others have offered and would look at the source. If the source seemed nice, or better if you are familiar with the source, perhaps the B22 is simply not your cup of tea. Theres nothing wrong with that.
 
One of the worst things about meets is that its often quite hard to hear an amp on a source you are familiar with. Reducing/eliminating variables can be tricky.
 
Quote:
Time for you to hear another Beta22 off a good source, with good quality music and with good headphones.  Also, as those Hifiman planar headphones are EXTREMELY inefficient, a using low gain won't be too much fun

 
If the headphones/speakers are playing at your desired volume level and the volume knob is not allllll the way up against the maximum volume level there is enough gain. If you have never spun the volume knob all the way up with your least efficient headphones there is too much gain. Considering gain-bandwidth-products, the fact that random noise in op-amps generally increases as gain increases, and how normal resistive/wasteful attenuators work having your gain set a little on the low side is generally better than a little on the high side.
 
Whether my standard of "enough" and "too much" gain applies under meet conditions where even the best of us listen a decent bit louder than we do at home is a bit of a debatable point.
 
Jun 15, 2010 at 12:26 AM Post #9 of 31

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikongod /img/forum/go_quote.gif
 
If the headphones/speakers are playing at your desired volume level and the volume knob is not allllll the way up against the maximum volume level there is enough gain. If you have never spun the volume knob all the way up with your least efficient headphones there is too much gain. Considering gain-bandwidth-products, the fact that random noise in op-amps generally increases as gain increases, and how normal resistive/wasteful attenuators work having your gain set a little on the low side is generally better than a little on the high side.
 
Whether my standard of "enough" and "too much" gain applies under meet conditions where even the best of us listen a decent bit louder than we do at home is a bit of a debatable point.

 
x2.  my Fostex FR speakers sound great with my Pass DIY B1 buffer at 5 o'clock, my 1.4VRM y2 DAC,  and Gainclone with 13 dB gain
smile.gif
.  9 o'clock is sooo yesterday and unnecessary.  
 
i can easily wick up my 8x gain B22 to 3 o'clock with older ECM digital recordings driving my K702 though.
 
 
Jun 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM Post #12 of 31
i thought neat wiring would be enough? what else do you need to look out for so that the sound quality is not affected?
 
Jun 16, 2010 at 2:14 PM Post #13 of 31
neat actually has very little to do with it - the real trick is keeping signal wires as far away from power wires as possible, and DEFINITELY not having them run in parallel close to each other.  any time they must cross, it should be done at 90 degree angles.  these two things should reduce noise by quite a margin, but it still takes a lot of time and a lot of tweaking by moving the wiring around until you reach perfection
 
Quote:
i thought neat wiring would be enough? what else do you need to look out for so that the sound quality is not affected?



 
Jun 16, 2010 at 2:25 PM Post #14 of 31
does this also apply in 2-case situation, where the psu is in a separate box?
 
Jun 16, 2010 at 2:29 PM Post #15 of 31
yes, but not NEARLY as much.  once you go 2-box, 90% of the challenge goes away :) 
 
at least, so says MoodySteve
 
Quote:
does this also apply in 2-case situation, where the psu is in a separate box?



 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top