Quote:
Originally Posted by mnemonix /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Music is musical, nothing about a headphone can be.
Whether a headphone helps you enjoy the music is another matter, but that will be a result of other more tangible & quantifyable attributes. I can't agree that musicality conveys any useful information about a headphone to anyone but the specific listener using the word, for whom both its meaning & requirements are personal.
I don't believe anyone said prat is meaningless.
|
This is a really good point, actually, but I still disagree when it comes to a headphone being capable of portraying music
musically. Subjective though it may be - and subsequently difficult to quantify without a first-hand listen, to me the musicality of the phone
is those other more "tangible and quantifiable" attributes, or a collection thereof... one of which is tone and most certainly PRaT (and in my case, warmth over ultra-detail). Subjective though these things may be, I can tell you that the headphones I've read as being musical from members I've learned to heed over the years have rarely disappointed. And I did miss the mark on the PRaT comment, sorry.
[EDIT for the EDIT]
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnemonix /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I understand the desire to expand our language and ability to describe and convey every nuance of the subject we're passionate about, but I don't think it helps to adopt lazy & meaningless jargon which superficially gives a sense of meaning but ultimately says nothing.
|
Use and abuse are not one and the same. Coming from the right people, a musical headphone is all the information I need to, at the very least, pique my interest in hearing the referenced product. Laziness is something altogether different, of course. If someone were
reviewing or posting full impressions on a headphone and relied on simply claiming musicality then, yes, that's not helpful. But using that in conjunction with the base criteria that work to make the headphone musical is most certainly valuable to me.