If the Audigy is feeding it, you'll have the same result plus or minus some colouration.
In other works, the digital stream has already been resampled to 48K, so the Audigy has put its blemish on the result even before it hits the DAC. To make matters worse the Audigy is not great or even good jitter wise, ok data jitter, horrid electrical jitter. Molested signal sent poorly to any DAC is going to sound like a what it is
Originally Posted by Solude A DAC doesn't feed itself
If the Audigy is feeding it, you'll have the same result plus or minus some colouration.
In other works, the digital stream has already been resampled to 48K, so the Audigy has put its blemish on the result even before it hits the DAC. To make matters worse the Audigy is not great or even good jitter wise, ok data jitter, horrid electrical jitter. Molested signal sent poorly to any DAC is going to sound like a what it is
I meant replacing the Audigy as SOURCE, not Audigy as TRANSPORT
It'd be better to get a different sound card anyway, for the reasons you stated.
Originally Posted by maarek99 That is so bull. A2 digitally to my cheap integrated receiver (+ rega ear) sounded BETTER than the emu 0404's analogue outs directly to the rega.
44->48khz is no problem. Just use a software resampler, you won't notice a difference.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.