Auzentech X-Fi Prelude Review
Sep 3, 2007 at 8:25 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 23

JAG87

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Posts
277
Likes
37
[size=xx-large]Auzentech X-Fi Prelude[/size]




pict1020tk6.jpg

The retail box art. Very nice!



pict1026jo6.jpg

The card fresh out of it's plastic casing



pict1056hy1.jpg

The booty shot. Take a look at the IO solder points, the PCB is nicely labeled



pict1072pj9.jpg

The perspective of good sound.





[size=large]I/O Connections:[/size]

[size=small]If you are used to Creative cards, this will be a huge change. At the back we find Optical/Coaxial SPDIF Input, Optical/Coaxial SPDIF Output,
MIC Input, LINE-IN Input, and 4 sets of stereo 3.5mm minijacks (Front LR, Center/SW, Surround LR, and Rear LR).
[/size]




pict1096ov1.jpg

The card comes with a free TOSLINK cable, and 2 optical adapters. Nice!




[size=large]
Components:
[/size]
[size=small]
Creative X-Fi CA20K audio processor
One AKM AK-5394 super high performance 96kHz 24-bit ADC for analog input
Four AKM AK-4396 96kHz 24-bit advanced multi-bit DAC for analog output
64Mbytes of memory for audio processing
High fidelity audio OPAMPs for analog input and output (TI OPA2134)
Front L/R output OPAMP is replaceable by end-user (National LM4562NA)
Dual mode S/PDIF receiver and transmitter
[/size]




pict1041rx8.jpg

The 64MB of X-RAM. In case any of you memory freaks are wondering, those are MICRON ECC SDRAM ICs



pict1046qn8.jpg

More X-RAM pornography



pict1047fv3.jpg

The Texas Instruments OPA2134 op-amps and the AKM AK4396VF DACs



pict1049nj0.jpg

The National LM4562NA high performance op-amp, with its interchangeable socket



[size=large]
Audio Performance:
[/size]

[size=small]Signal-to-Noise Ratio (20kHz Low-pass filter, A-Weighted)
Stereo Output : 120dB (part spec)
Front and Rear Channels : 120dB (part spec)
Center : 120dB (part spec)
Subwoofer and Side Channels : 120dB (part spec)
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise at 1kHz (-3dBFS, A-weighted) : 0.001% - part spec
Frequency Response (+/-0.01dB, 24-bit/44.1kHz input ) : 20khz (part spec)
Frequency Response (+/-0.01dB, 24-bit/96kHz input ) : 43.5 khz (part spec)
16-bit to 24-bit recording sampling rates: 32, 44.1, 48 and 96kHz


To give you an idea, most Creative boards have a Stereo Output S/N ratio of 109 dB, while the Elite Pro is 116 dB.
The Total Harmonic Distortion is 0.004% while the Elite Pro is 0.0008%.
[/size]





[size=large]Drivers:[/size]


[size=small]The only drivers available at the moment are the drivers that come with the CD. I have installed the Windows XP drivers, I have no idea how the Vista drivers behave.

In any case I wouldn't expect them to be much better than the Creative's Vista drivers everyone has "loved" so far.

The drivers are extremely easy to install, you just pop in the CD, and click the install drivers button. The routine installs the Auzentech Audio Console, and the Console Launcher.
[/size]



ctlaunchervi6.jpg

The Auzentech Audio Console. Look familiar?



consolelauncherrt0.jpg

The Console Launcher




[size=small]If you are buying this card for its Dolby and DTS capabilities, you will be left with a sour tooth. With the current drivers the card has no Dolby/DTS decoding capabilities.
You can clearly see from the screenshots that there is no Dolby/DTS tab, and using SPDIF in programs will not work.

I have a feeling all Dolby and DTS features will come with the Q4 driver release.
This release should add all Dolby and DTS decoding features as well as encoding (Dolby Digital Live, DTS Interactive and DTS Neo).
[/size]

Please check this link for more information
http://www.auzentech.com/data/prelud...tus_082807.pdf




[size=large]
Sound Testing:
[/size]

[size=small]The following tests were conducted with the sound card hooked up to a Technics Stereo Amplifier and a pair of JBL towers.
For headphone testing the Sennheiser HD280 Pro were used (wish I had 595 or 650s to test with)


DD 5.1 448 kb/s through PowerDVD Ultra (set to 2.0)
DD Plus 5.1 640 kb/s through PowerDVD Ultra (set to 2.0)
DD TrueHD through PowerDVD Ultra (set to 2.0)
MP3 @ 256 kb/s through iTunes
Battlefield 2 (all settings max)
[/size]




[size=large]
The Dolby results:
[/size]
[size=small]
To be honest, there is not much difference here between the Creative card, and the Auzentech card.
With the mode set to Audio Creation and the bit-matched playback enabled, the two cards sound nearly identical.

The most difference is shown in the TrueHD soundtrack, where the Auzentech card seems to have more clarity and deeper bass.
But otherwise, the cards are both excellent. Liquid gold in, liquid gold out
[/size]



[size=large]
The MP3 results:
[/size]

[size=small]With a flat listening experience (bit-matched) the Auzentech card has a crisper, less veiled sound.
The Creative card has duller highs and bass. Still, it's not night and day, they are pretty evenly matched.
Where the Auzentech card really excells is the post processing. The Creative card just doesn't stand a chance.
Where before the Crystallizer was a hiss/bass distortion feature, it now becomes a fantastic feature.
The Crystallizer gives your flat MP3s a much needed extended bass and high range that is clean and crisp, not distorted and uncomfortable.
To measure this difference, I will show you an example with numbers.

With the Xtreme Music, as soon as you raise the Crystallizer level above 0% you can already start to hear bass distortion at high volumes.

With the Auzentech I find myself enjoying up to 50% Crystallizer at high volumes with absolutely pristine bass and highs. Clearly the better components on the card are paying off here.
[/size]




[size=large]
The Battlefield 2 results:
[/size]

[size=small]This deserves a 10/10 for improvement, there is just no comparison. With the Crystallizer enabled now that its actually worth using, the sound is just insane.
If I even try to raise the Crystallizer above 0% with the Xtreme Music, the distortion is evident. With the Prelude the Crystallizer is everything it should be.

Im not sure I can portray with words the fact that when you fire a shell from your Abrahams tank, your ears ring.
It actually feels like your inside the tank, thats how amazing it is. Its not flat and dull, its punchy and crisp.
[/size]



[size=large]
Wrapping things up:
[/size]

[size=small]This card shows clear improvement over the cheaper Creative cards, when the card is stressed to its limits.
These limits are reached by using the Crystallizer at high volume, because this feature enhances the bass and the highs so much
that if the components are not up the task the resulting sound is actually worse than the original pre-processed signal.





[size=large] So who should purchase this card? [/size]


[size=small]You should not be purchasing this card[/size]

1) if your speakers or headphones are worth less than the card. Its as simple as that.
You will not notice the difference with sub 200 dollar speakers or cheap headphones, it just wont happen.

2) if you like low volumes. You need the right amount of sound pressure to hear the difference,
at low volumes the card does not sound 100 dollars better than the Xtreme Music or the Xtreme Gamer cards.





[size=small]You should be purchasing this card[/size]

1) if you have a nice set of speakers (like the Logitech Z5500s) and you frequently turn them up for good listening sessions or movie watching,
or if you connect your PC to a receiver/amplifier with good quality speakers.

2) if you have high-end headphones like HD595s, HD600, HD650, Beyerdynamic DT-880 and 990s, AKG K701s.
If you have an amp for your headphones you will enter PC-as-source audio nirvana.



I hope you enjoyed my review of the Auzentech X-Fi Prelude, if you have any questions please dont hesitate to ask! I will do my best to answer them.
[/size]



 
Sep 3, 2007 at 8:45 PM Post #2 of 23
Only thing wrong with this review is calling the z-5500 speakers good.


Also, why so much focus on the crystalizer? Many people here probably don't use it because it alters the feel of the sound way too much.
 
Sep 3, 2007 at 8:45 PM Post #3 of 23
Let it be noted the X-Fi DSP only supports two sampling rates in hardware. 44.1KHz and 48KHz. Anything else is resampled on the fly by the DSP. Granted the resampler is of much higher quality than the POS one on the Audigy cards. Just making sure this is known.

Also, true 44.1KHz output is ONLY available in Audio Creation mode.
 
Sep 3, 2007 at 9:13 PM Post #4 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by 003 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Let it be noted the X-Fi DSP only supports two sampling rates in hardware. 44.1KHz and 48KHz. Anything else is resampled on the fly by the DSP. Granted the resampler is of much higher quality than the POS one on the Audigy cards. Just making sure this is known.

Also, true 44.1KHz output is ONLY available in Audio Creation mode.



You can have resampling turned off.

If what you say is true, you could not record or play back frequencies higher than about 24khz.

Again, if this were true, why would they have 192khz capable DACs, if the signal they receive is max sample rate of 48khz?

And actually, from what I've read, everything is OVER sampled. Even 192khz streams. not down sampled.
 
Sep 3, 2007 at 10:10 PM Post #5 of 23
First of all, in most music you are hard pressed to hear anything that is part of the music which is even half of 24KHz, second of all almost nobody can hear 24KHz, and for the few that can, see the first point.

I don't know why they have 192KHz capable DACs, maybe because it looks nice on paper? I'm not talking about the resampling that can be controlled in software, I am saying that the X-fi DSP can internally only work with samplerates of 44.1 and 48khz, and only 44.1 in Audio Creation mode. If you play back anything over 48khz, the digital signal is resampled to 48khz by the DSP, processed, and then resampled back to whatever the original samplerate was before being sent to the dac. And vice versa for digial input.

Source:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...1813722,00.asp

Quote:

the X-Fi's core can run at two internal sampling rates, 44.1 KHz and 48 KHz, although it will only run at 44.1KHz in Creation mode, and if you specifically tell it to do so.


 
Sep 3, 2007 at 10:17 PM Post #6 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by LawnGnome /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Only thing wrong with this review is calling the z-5500 speakers good.


Also, why so much focus on the crystalizer? Many people here probably don't use it because it alters the feel of the sound way too much.




well, the z5500 are the best pc speakers you can get. keyword "pc".

I focused on the crystallizer because its a feature that you will actually use with the Auzen card. The reason people here dont use it, is because it sounds like crap on the Creative cards, and even I had it always turned off. not anymore though

580smile.gif
 
Sep 3, 2007 at 10:58 PM Post #7 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by 003 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I don't know why they have 192KHz capable DACs, maybe because it looks nice on paper? I'm not talking about the resampling that can be controlled in software, I am saying that the X-fi DSP can internally only work with samplerates of 44.1 and 48khz, and only 44.1 in Audio Creation mode. If you play back anything over 48khz, the digital signal is resampled to 48khz by the DSP, processed, and then resampled back to whatever the original samplerate was before being sent to the dac. And vice versa for digial input.

Source:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...1813722,00.asp



Sorry, but that is BS.

The X-FI's dsp can also operate with 96khz material by simply splitting the signal into two 48khz ones, applying dsp and combining them again. There is no resampling going on. And if you enable bit-perfect then the signal won't even go into the dsp.

Also why are these part specs only? The elite pro also has a 120db dynamic range if you just look at the dacs spec. Why not compare real specs with RMAA for instance??

Do you know why the x-fi distorts? It distorts if you're trying to raise the signal over max. So please lower your main output volume. This comparison is pointless, you're just hearing clipping with the x-fi. Still waiting for a good review.
 
Sep 3, 2007 at 11:00 PM Post #8 of 23
Thank you very much for that review and photos. Very nice work!. Now, you didn't mention the digital camera you used. It takes very nice pics.

This is one of the few reviews that I actually read it entirely, because is very easy to read and pleasant to my eyes. Thank you, indeed.

TURBO
 
Sep 3, 2007 at 11:11 PM Post #9 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by maarek99 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Sorry, but that is BS.

The X-FI's dsp can also operate with 96khz material by simply splitting the signal into two 48khz ones, applying dsp and combining them again. There is no resampling going on. And if you enable bit-perfect then the signal won't even go into the dsp.



That is what I thought. I was surprised when I read it myself. I think I misinterpreted the article. I think it means that 44.1 and 48 are the base samplerates supported samplerates of the two oscillators, and they can also operate at multiples of 44.1 and 48.
 
Sep 3, 2007 at 11:23 PM Post #10 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by maarek99 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Sorry, but that is BS.

The X-FI's dsp can also operate with 96khz material by simply splitting the signal into two 48khz ones, applying dsp and combining them again. There is no resampling going on. And if you enable bit-perfect then the signal won't even go into the dsp.

Also why are these part specs only? The elite pro also has a 120db dynamic range if you just look at the dacs spec. Why not compare real specs with RMAA for instance??

Do you know why the x-fi distorts? It distorts if you're trying to raise the signal over max. So please lower your main output volume. This comparison is pointless, you're just hearing clipping with the x-fi. Still waiting for a good review.




Ok, first of all I compared both cards at the exact same volume. Second of all I lower and raise my volume from my receiver, not from windows. I have never had any kind of clipping or whatever crap you are talking about. The bass on the Creative card is not clean, its not defined, its starts to get "gargled" when the Crystallizer is at 50%. While on the Auzentech its still clean and defined.

The comparison is not pointless, and I am not hearing clipping with the Creative card. I owned the XtremeMusic since it came out, and trust me I haven't been listening to clipping all this time. Im sorry you did not like the review, but there is no need to comment like that when you dont have the grounds to say certain things.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TURBO /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Thank you very much for that review and photos. Very nice work!. Now, you didn't mention the digital camera you used. It takes very nice pics.

This is one of the few reviews that I actually read it entirely, because is very easy to read and pleasant to my eyes. Thank you, indeed.

TURBO



hey, I'm glad you enjoyed it buddy. I used a Dimage Z4. Its not that good, I wish I had a DSLR camera...
 
Sep 4, 2007 at 3:21 AM Post #12 of 23
I'd like to know if the Pins are compatibles with the Platinum front panel. I've already ordered this card and still have to wait a week for it to come it. Also, in the review are both cards being used at the same time?
 
Sep 4, 2007 at 6:07 AM Post #13 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by badbadtz560 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
what i'm curious about is if these compare to similarly priced products like the emu0404 and such. anybody have experience with both?
biggrin.gif



It would be interesting to compare it to the emu0404. Too bad you can't game with one of those
tongue.gif
 
Sep 4, 2007 at 8:19 PM Post #15 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by goldenslug /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I'd like to know if the Pins are compatibles with the Platinum front panel.


They are not compatible.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top