Trae
500+ Head-Fier
Well, I bought an AD2000X to mod, but I received an AD900X instead
. Gotta love Amazon Marketplace. Anyway, Compared to my modded AD2000s, the sound signature is very similar. They're a bit tamed in the midrange, but overall, very similar sounding. They actually use the same diaphragm membrane that the AD1000 and up use. Looking at the construction of the driver, it looks like they changed everything internally vs. the AD900 except for the magnet. There is more dampening behind the driver, a different membrane being used, and a different grill protecting the membrane.
Going off of memory from the MA900 and K712 I owned, I prefer the AD900X over both after equalization. A mini-review of the three:
MA900:
Bass- Basically no sub-bass, and you rely on the rumble of the headphone on your ears to get any physical feedback. Said feedback is okay.
Mids- weak, very weak
Highs- pretty good, nice air
Imaging- very good
Soundstage- Sounds like the center is above you, with the left/right soundstage being pretty close by.
K712:
Bass- decent quantity given the open nature. Quality is good too.
Mids- pretty good. A bit thin sounding, but nice.
Highs- pretty good, nice air
Imaging- very good
Soundstage- Very similar to the MA900, but a bit wider
AD900x:
Bass- very good given the weak seal. More quantity than MA900, but slightly less than K712. Quality is very good.
Mids- pretty odd stock. The 4kHz resonance in the upper mids is extremely aggravating. Lowering it about 12dB improves the sound GREATLY (and bumping ~2kHz by about 5dB helps with presence). Mids are better than the above two afterwards.
Highs- very good, nice air
Imaging- pretty good. Not as good as the above two, but the soundstage realism makes up for it.
Soundstage- very good. One of the most balanced stages that I've heard. The center is actually in front of you, and it nicely fills in the L/R gap. The width is pretty realistic.
Transparency-wise, they're all in the same ballpark. I'd put the K712 up top (marginally), with the AD9x and MA900 being tied.
Just a bit of expansion on the soundstage, the above two headphones have some sort of a three blob effect (Left, Right, and top-front), and all positional cues seem to radiate from those areas. The AD9x seems to have a nice semi-circle in comparison, and it sounds more realistic.
.gif)
Going off of memory from the MA900 and K712 I owned, I prefer the AD900X over both after equalization. A mini-review of the three:
MA900:
Bass- Basically no sub-bass, and you rely on the rumble of the headphone on your ears to get any physical feedback. Said feedback is okay.
Mids- weak, very weak
Highs- pretty good, nice air
Imaging- very good
Soundstage- Sounds like the center is above you, with the left/right soundstage being pretty close by.
K712:
Bass- decent quantity given the open nature. Quality is good too.
Mids- pretty good. A bit thin sounding, but nice.
Highs- pretty good, nice air
Imaging- very good
Soundstage- Very similar to the MA900, but a bit wider
AD900x:
Bass- very good given the weak seal. More quantity than MA900, but slightly less than K712. Quality is very good.
Mids- pretty odd stock. The 4kHz resonance in the upper mids is extremely aggravating. Lowering it about 12dB improves the sound GREATLY (and bumping ~2kHz by about 5dB helps with presence). Mids are better than the above two afterwards.
Highs- very good, nice air
Imaging- pretty good. Not as good as the above two, but the soundstage realism makes up for it.
Soundstage- very good. One of the most balanced stages that I've heard. The center is actually in front of you, and it nicely fills in the L/R gap. The width is pretty realistic.
Transparency-wise, they're all in the same ballpark. I'd put the K712 up top (marginally), with the AD9x and MA900 being tied.
Just a bit of expansion on the soundstage, the above two headphones have some sort of a three blob effect (Left, Right, and top-front), and all positional cues seem to radiate from those areas. The AD9x seems to have a nice semi-circle in comparison, and it sounds more realistic.