HT cOz
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Posts
- 8
- Likes
- 0
Anyone interested in a NFB-3 for imediate delivery please PM me.
Kind Regards,
Robert
Kind Regards,
Robert
May I test at tomorrow for ensure and reply you?
If I have not wrong memory, I was test the WM8805 at 132KHz had fail.
Change to WM8805 just for 192KHz SPDIF support, ago we offer the DIR9001 as default and the WM8805 or CS8416 as a free option when order, some lot customers like to choice the WM8805 or CS8416.
But we still quite flexible, who want change to DIR9001 just free while order .
The Last, the WM8805 sound beat the CS8416 in my mind, closed flavor but detail is clearer.
The Last, the WM8805 sound beat the CS8416 in my mind, closed flavor but detail is clearer.
I have the exact same question as Nick. I have ordered one from Pacific Valve and am assuming that the 8805 is standard. However, due to some recent comments I am wondering if the DIR9001 is the better performer. I would like to know quickly in case I need to modify my order with Pacific Valve. I like "smooth" sound BUT, not if it just rolls off the other information on the disc. If the DIR is "rougher" then I will stick with the 8805. I don't want smooth at the expense of natural resolution. Look forward to your reply Kingwa and thank you for participating in this thread.
Other posters have said not to worry if you read earlier posts on the topic in this thread. It shouldnt be the HUGE effect as posted earlier in this thread.
Quote:I have the exact same question as Nick. I have ordered one from Pacific Valve and am assuming that the 8805 is standard. However, due to some recent comments I am wondering if the DIR9001 is the better performer. I would like to know quickly in case I need to modify my order with Pacific Valve. I like "smooth" sound BUT, not if it just rolls off the other information on the disc. If the DIR is "rougher" then I will stick with the 8805. I don't want smooth at the expense of natural resolution. Look forward to your reply Kingwa and thank you for participating in this thread.
mas,
You seemed to have just stepped to an extreme with the quote "you lose all details." I am under the impression that the detail is there but less edgy or possibly clear at the worst. You do have a unique advantage in having both modules at the ready and your phones seem to be pretty good. How many other cd's, albums have you listened to? Does the sound still seem less clear. Care to give us a 1-10 scale for comparison on how the two receivers shake out maybe in different areas of sound (bass, treble, midrange, ambience, vocals, complex music). Anyway, I appreciate you offering some needed insight on the dac and its receiver chips, but a little more thorough analysis would be a good thing.
Thanks for the reply Kingwa.
I know that the USB input does not support 88.2 khz due to the Tenor USB chip, however does the DAC (W/ DIR9001) support 88.2 khz over S/PDIF?
Quote:Thanks for the reply Kingwa.
I know that the USB input does not support 88.2 khz due to the Tenor USB chip, however does the DAC (W/ DIR9001) support 88.2 khz over S/PDIF?
Had test, can process 88.2KHz .