jonchard
500+ Head-Fier
I wonder how the distortion or lack thereof compares to electrostatic drivers.
I didn't call them bombproof. I referred to them as being "largely bombproof" with V2. The foam in the case is there in every Audeze since day dot i believe. It was there with the 4Z, the LCD-XC and the LCD-X. The early drivers were so thin they needed reinforcing with a V2 version - i think this was the only first release where the driver was especially weak and pressing earpads became a major and common problem enough to demand a redesign - I guess it threatened the profit margins!Even the latest LCD-4 version I wouldn‘t exactly call “bombproof” in this regard.
Avoid hard-pushing the sealed cups (on your head or onto each other), to be sure to not to rip a diaphragm.
This might easily happen with rough handling during boxed transport too.
The original pelican case has a piece of open-cell foam between the cups for the good reason: to prevent air pressure buildup on one side of the diaphragms.
This can easily be replicated, use any little piece of open cell foam between the cups when storing them, for a long and happy life with your LCD-4.
Power-wise LCD-4 seems to be capable to take whatever you throw at it - within at least half-reasonable levels.
Impossible to make them distort either.
@jlbrach - I AB'd Abyss and LCD4 today.
Without EQ, Abyss is slightly deeper and ever so slightly more plentiful. With EQ, LCD4 can take the reigns and play louder than Abyss can without distortion. If you dont listen over 90db then it might not be something you never pick up on, but LCD4 is boundless on a good amp. What took me by surprise was just how sucked out the midrange is on the Abyss. Whilst AB'in i utterly loved both, but i found LCD4 to be more filled in where expected! I think could be content with the sound of either one, the fitment on the other hand is something else. I notice the weight of LCD4 over Abyss and it quickly gets tiresome. The Abyss having such sucked out midrange sounds more 3d and spacious, this is to be expected. But the distance from ear to cup does add a strangeness and vacancy of voices, makes almost an echo that is not experienced with LCD4 at all. For some music, the v-shaped sound of Abyss is just perfect, but when asked to play something with real instruments rather than electronica, it sounds wonky as heck! Timbre and tone becomes really clear when flipping 3 headphones of such calibre (Immanis being the third).
Im expecting to keep LCD4 because it offers something different to Immanis and Abyss. I find the Abyss and Immanis too similar in regards to massive stage, slightly sucked mids on Immanis, majorly depressed on Abyss. I think LCD4 offers a better alternative flavour than having such similar traits. I'm still AB'ing... its too much fun and its rather interesting to see how genre specific headphones can be!
Testing "Dog Baits Man - Reid Willis" (Thank you @Aetherhole !) its incredible how differently presented this song is between the three headphones. Immanis is decent, but polite. It shows the beauty of sounds and is placement perfect. LCD4 Wraps you around the head with a visceral physicality that is quite brutal. Abyss shows techinically how this song should be played from the bass to to the highs and impresses in the way it goes about it. Its not the ultimate in bass but its all there and its well presented. Wide staging works well here. I think it offers more detail than the LCD4, its more brightly illuminated but not overly bright.
If you have LCD4 or Abyss, try this song LOUD - What an experience!!
Last edited: