KR...
Curator of the Headphone Lust Museum
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Posts
- 9,534
- Likes
- 32
You should get some binaural recordings of earthquakes

Originally posted by Ross I have the CD3000 and an Earmax Pro, and they sound okay together, but still not as good as the Senn 600. |
Originally posted by markl Spad, Here are my thoughts on the bass from another thread. I'd be curious to get your take: "I've just had an epiphany about the the bass response of these headphones. I think I've reacted so positively to the w2002's bass not because it goes so incredibly low, although it is as low as any other good headphone I've heard, but because of the way my ears react to the actual physical feeling of the bass. The W2002 provides a sort of "ear massage" with the ultra smooth and effortless, yet energetic bass. The way it resonates is very stimulating and pleasing to the ear. All this has made me speculate about the true purpose and function of the DADS system. So, its basically an enclosure behind the diaphragm. I suspect this enclosure is trapping air in some manner and releasing it in a very specific way to create the feeling of impact. This is my theory at least. This adds to the "stimulation" of the ears *as if* they were reacting to *real* low bass sound waves in the open air. |
Originally posted by Audio&Me If there's ever a Boston head-fi meeting, I'll be there! Bring your W2002s everybody! =) Oh and as many amps as possible. |
Originally posted by Audio&Me Using babelfish, I checked the AT page, and they seem to have similar specs. Except the W100 is ugly! ![]() Where does one order the W100 in the US? $300? |
Originally posted by Spad The bass . . . ah, the bass. It's simply the best I've heard on a 'phone. It extends as low as the Ety 4s, but with a visceral impact that I didn't think possible in a headphone. This feature alone is almost enough to move the W2002s to the head of their class--and I'm no bass nut. The overall sound, the combination of clarity, tonal balance, speed, and the ability to resolve complex textures, rivals and may even exceed, that of the Etymotics. I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Ety fan, but I sincerely believe I'm not exaggerating. |
Originally posted by Audio&Me Using babelfish, I checked the AT page, and they seem to have similar specs. Except the W100 is ugly! Where does one order the W100 in the US? How does the ATH-W11R compare? |
Originally posted by M Rael These W2002's sound like they have potential. |
Originally posted by Spad I wonder how many made it to the States. |
Audio&Me said... How does the ATH-W11R compare? |
Originally posted by JML Go hang out with that poorly-built babe from Brooklyn. |