I read them before I made my post. That's my point. I don't understand the principle against a consumer making a profit off of a deal they took advantage of VS giving hi-fi members a great deal on a quality headphone. For example:
1) hi-fi member purchases $150 headphone and uses it for awhile.....decides to get something different........sells headphone on here for $100
2) hi-fi member receives same headphone as a gift for free.......tries it out, but prefers what he already has......sells headphone on here for $100
3) hi-fi member purchases same headphone at the amazing price of $10........tries it, but decides not to keep it.........sells it on here $50
4) same as #3 except purchase was made with intent to flip it
So, it sounds like the only acceptable option for this forum is #1. But what is so wrong with the other 3, especially considering options 3 and 4 are twice as beneficial to hi-fi members?