I'm the one who said they are sibilant!
There were sharp ssss sounds that I found annoying and this is why I felt they were sibilant, other than that I thought they were pretty good. I don't feel these are bright phones, the CK100 definitely places more influence on the higher frequencies. I agree that the CK10, CK100 and E-Q7 are better built, those of you expecting the build quality to be like CK10 and the 100 will be disappointed. They are built much more like the CK9 which in my opinion is still pretty good.
The other thing that I would like to point out is that the CK90Pros, the CK10 and CK100's I auditioned should be well burnt in since they have been playing in the store non-stop for god knows how long! As for the E-Q7, I doubt it was burnt in at all because it was not connected up to anything and is a fairly new IEM which looked to be in brand new condition.
I did prefer both my CK100 and the CK90Pro's over the E-Q7's in terms of SQ and fit.
Never listened to the CKS70 so I can't comment on how they compare.
There were sharp ssss sounds that I found annoying and this is why I felt they were sibilant, other than that I thought they were pretty good. I don't feel these are bright phones, the CK100 definitely places more influence on the higher frequencies. I agree that the CK10, CK100 and E-Q7 are better built, those of you expecting the build quality to be like CK10 and the 100 will be disappointed. They are built much more like the CK9 which in my opinion is still pretty good.
The other thing that I would like to point out is that the CK90Pros, the CK10 and CK100's I auditioned should be well burnt in since they have been playing in the store non-stop for god knows how long! As for the E-Q7, I doubt it was burnt in at all because it was not connected up to anything and is a fairly new IEM which looked to be in brand new condition.
I did prefer both my CK100 and the CK90Pro's over the E-Q7's in terms of SQ and fit.
Never listened to the CKS70 so I can't comment on how they compare.