add2music
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 0
Hello all,
I have bought Asgard for amping my HD650 with Pico DAC/Amp. I am using Pico HP out to feed Asgard with Pico gain set to high.My source is Mac 256kbps VBR / FLAC. Burn-in for Asgard is around 50hours.
I could see Asgard is driving HD650 without any trouble. Comparing HP out of Pico and Asgard with HD650, i dont see very big change in sound spectrum. I have changed the gain settings of Pico to low, still no big change in sound spectrum. I am using amped signal to feed Asgard.
Is Asgard meant to be for low impedance cans ( or the synergy is good with Low impedance cans compared to higher ones ) ?
Do i need to have dedicated DAC ( in the place of Pico DAC/Amp ) to bring out HD650 completely ?
your inputs are highly appreciated.
PS: I dont see white marks / outer skin oily touch when Asgard becomes hot. Yes !! the bottom part of Asgard is considerably hot , we aren't going to keep them in our lap , are we ??
I have bought Asgard for amping my HD650 with Pico DAC/Amp. I am using Pico HP out to feed Asgard with Pico gain set to high.My source is Mac 256kbps VBR / FLAC. Burn-in for Asgard is around 50hours.
I could see Asgard is driving HD650 without any trouble. Comparing HP out of Pico and Asgard with HD650, i dont see very big change in sound spectrum. I have changed the gain settings of Pico to low, still no big change in sound spectrum. I am using amped signal to feed Asgard.
Is Asgard meant to be for low impedance cans ( or the synergy is good with Low impedance cans compared to higher ones ) ?
Do i need to have dedicated DAC ( in the place of Pico DAC/Amp ) to bring out HD650 completely ?
your inputs are highly appreciated.
PS: I dont see white marks / outer skin oily touch when Asgard becomes hot. Yes !! the bottom part of Asgard is considerably hot , we aren't going to keep them in our lap , are we ??