Peter Pinna
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2008
- Posts
- 1,002
- Likes
- 79
Quote:
I have thought of that. I wondered if I might be imagining the "surround effect". The only problem with this theory is that I know other people personally who are also able to hear the effect too. One, in particular, is a sound engineer with a very critical ear. And, without telling another person anything about the "surround effect", I let her listen and the first thing she said (after listening for only about a minute) had to do with one of the instruments being in front of her and then she mentioned that some other instrument was behind her and so on. She then wanted to know why she could hear these sounds in different places away from her head. This person is not an audiophile, actually never uses and could probably care less about headphones so, her being able to hear the "surround effect" is, it seems to me, a validity (in and of itself) of it's existence.
There have also been other posts here on Head-Fi where the posters have claimed to be able to hear it. I plan on doing some more testing with other people I know. When I introduce the Pro 750's to someone I say, "Tell me what you think of these headphones." I give them no clue about there being anything special about the sound.
So, if people I know personally have told me they hear it and other posters here on Head-Fi as well as in other articles I've read claim that they have heard it, then we must all be "fanboys" who are dealing with a mass imagination of the "surround effect". I think not.
In actuality, I have no idea why I and some others are capable of hearing the "surround effect" while you and some others seem to be incapable of hearing it. There is the consideration of the theories about which you have probably already read. Other than that consideration, once again, I do not know the reason for this.
I do know one thing for certain, I am not going to "stoop" to calling you a name because you are unable to hear the "surround effect", the way that you and a few others have called me a name ("fanboy") partly because I am able to hear it. And, yes, I do know that another reason I was being called this name is because I have written often about the Pro 750. In actuality, I have written about other topics in these forums. But, there is no doubt, and I will readily admit that the reason I have written often about the Pro 750 is because I really like it. Yes, I have heard some other audiophile headphones, and of the one's I've heard, I like the Pro 750 best (as you know). So, I've written about it whenever I thought it fit the specific requirements of someone who was looking for a headphone. There have been numerous times when I didn't mention the Pro 750 because it wasn't "right" for the particular requirements of someone searching for headphones.
Would you rather that I would have lied and suggested to someone that they purchase another headphone when I really thought that the Pro 750 was their best choice? My opinion is, if I did that, I would be hypocritical. But, there are some on Head-Fi (and you may be one of them) who think I should be hypocritical in this way, just so I can "fit in" with certain other Head-Fi members.
I do not work that way. I state what I believe even if my belief goes against popular opinion. When you read one of my posts, you might disagree with me (which is fine with me), but one thing is certain: You will know exactly "where I stand".
Originally Posted by malldian /img/forum/go_quote.gif A few things here, to the OP: After hearing the AKG K1000, the sound stage and presentation was out of this world, I would certainly try to listen to a pair of those. To Peter: Remember something you keep bringing up - just because you hear the S Logic, doesn't mean it exists either. Understand that, however slim the possibility might be, you might be being duped into believing the marketing hype. And as you said before, that certainly may be a good thing! Your persistent fanboism and crusading isn't convincing anyone of anything - if you disagree, state it once and let it be after that. |
I have thought of that. I wondered if I might be imagining the "surround effect". The only problem with this theory is that I know other people personally who are also able to hear the effect too. One, in particular, is a sound engineer with a very critical ear. And, without telling another person anything about the "surround effect", I let her listen and the first thing she said (after listening for only about a minute) had to do with one of the instruments being in front of her and then she mentioned that some other instrument was behind her and so on. She then wanted to know why she could hear these sounds in different places away from her head. This person is not an audiophile, actually never uses and could probably care less about headphones so, her being able to hear the "surround effect" is, it seems to me, a validity (in and of itself) of it's existence.
There have also been other posts here on Head-Fi where the posters have claimed to be able to hear it. I plan on doing some more testing with other people I know. When I introduce the Pro 750's to someone I say, "Tell me what you think of these headphones." I give them no clue about there being anything special about the sound.
So, if people I know personally have told me they hear it and other posters here on Head-Fi as well as in other articles I've read claim that they have heard it, then we must all be "fanboys" who are dealing with a mass imagination of the "surround effect". I think not.
In actuality, I have no idea why I and some others are capable of hearing the "surround effect" while you and some others seem to be incapable of hearing it. There is the consideration of the theories about which you have probably already read. Other than that consideration, once again, I do not know the reason for this.
I do know one thing for certain, I am not going to "stoop" to calling you a name because you are unable to hear the "surround effect", the way that you and a few others have called me a name ("fanboy") partly because I am able to hear it. And, yes, I do know that another reason I was being called this name is because I have written often about the Pro 750. In actuality, I have written about other topics in these forums. But, there is no doubt, and I will readily admit that the reason I have written often about the Pro 750 is because I really like it. Yes, I have heard some other audiophile headphones, and of the one's I've heard, I like the Pro 750 best (as you know). So, I've written about it whenever I thought it fit the specific requirements of someone who was looking for a headphone. There have been numerous times when I didn't mention the Pro 750 because it wasn't "right" for the particular requirements of someone searching for headphones.
Would you rather that I would have lied and suggested to someone that they purchase another headphone when I really thought that the Pro 750 was their best choice? My opinion is, if I did that, I would be hypocritical. But, there are some on Head-Fi (and you may be one of them) who think I should be hypocritical in this way, just so I can "fit in" with certain other Head-Fi members.
I do not work that way. I state what I believe even if my belief goes against popular opinion. When you read one of my posts, you might disagree with me (which is fine with me), but one thing is certain: You will know exactly "where I stand".