Are mobile phone going to replace DAP's eventually??
Jul 15, 2009 at 9:29 AM Post #61 of 80
hi, i'm not an audiophile but am a music lover and lover of gadgets. been following this very interesting thread.

the comment about hegemony of the cellphone caught my eye. i agree and share the trepidation of the possibility of a day where we will only have generic devices and no choice for people who just want one thing - good sounding music.

so maybe bringing more people over to the dark side is the strategy.
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 9:19 AM Post #63 of 80
God i hope phones don't replace DAP's, I recent purchased a LG & an SE Walkman and sold them both within a matter of weeks - On account of the ***** sound and massive amounts of hiss (Walkman W395) !!! LG's music player sorted album tracks A-Z rather than by track number, the SE Walkman was better but just sound crap (oh and a few buttons fell of the front).

Apple iPod or Sansa Clip does me just fine !
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 11:30 AM Post #64 of 80
The only issue that I have is waiting for all in one devices when the technology is out there and cheap enough to produce. The closest we've seen is the Iphone, and now many other company's are producing similar items.

Really it boils down to quality in reference to the device functionality.

wifi
3g/4g
audio out 3.5 mm
audio quality
battery quality/life
size
durability
productivity/programs
touch screen/qwerty keys

Those are just the things I could think of off the top of my head. I plan on getting an 3GS, but I want to look around more.
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 11:57 AM Post #65 of 80
Quote:

Originally Posted by spalliero /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The only issue that I have is waiting for all in one devices when the technology is out there and cheap enough to produce. The closest we've seen is the Iphone, and now many other company's are producing similar items.

Really it boils down to quality in reference to the device functionality.

wifi
3g/4g
audio out 3.5 mm
audio quality
battery quality/life
size
durability
productivity/programs
touch screen/qwerty keys

Those are just the things I could think of off the top of my head. I plan on getting an 3GS, but I want to look around more.



This is not a dis, but I find it interesting that audio quality is fourth on your list. That may have been inadvertent, and I am NOT saying that audio is not of great importance to you.

However, I think it's interesting, even if unintentional. Sound quality will never, in my opinion, be a top priority for phone manufacturers. If they go for top-quality DAC and amp components, the price of the final product will be pushed higher, in a market that is brutally price-competitive. So manufacturers will look askance at boosting their prices in order to provide top-quality sound.

This problem will be (already is) worsened by the fact that phones are possibly the massest mass-market electronics products on the market. And since the average consumer doesn't know good sound, care about good sound, or want to pay for good sound, good sound becomes a non-starter in an all-in-one product.

Some will undoubtedly argue that the iPhone belies this argument. I'm not sure I agree with that, but even if it does, that is a luxury that Apple will not long be able to afford. When everyone's phone includes a DAP, there will be a race to the bottom, both in terms of SQ and price. I doubt Apple will be able to retain its premium status forever, and even if they do, they are still going to have to deal with the realities of the marketplace.

And keep in mind that I'm an optimist.
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 12:31 PM Post #66 of 80
FINALLY! I've been waiting for a thread like this. Seriously, I am strongly against the use of cellphones as portable all-around gadget that can do anything. No Swiss-army device will replace a dedicated one, EVER.

Check out my Multiply Blog about this topic:
Welcome back, Comrade. - Cellphones: More Functions, Less Phone?

An excerpt:

"Of course, you will say that such devices are created to enhance portability and avoid carrying multiple gadgets at once. But, are these phones really worth it? I know that even a 5mp camphone cannot replace a real 5mp camera, nor a Walkman phone replace a real MP3 Player. Sure it's cool to have that all-in-one multimedia device. But what happens if you lose it or someone stole it? Say bye-bye to your camera, iPod, GPS, PSP, PC, etc. in one go.

The phone of today is not as good as the phone of yesterday. It may have the most and best features but let's remember what phones are actually invented for. If you want something like that then don't say anymore that that thing is actually a phone. It's not a device in a phone, but a phone in a device.

It's not just the advancement of the phones I'm worried about. The people who actually buy those things have no reason to purchase them other than for showing off and using its secondary functions. The mindset of people nowadays is they buy new phones for the camera, the music player, and not the phone. They even brag to everyone like "OMG I have this ten gazillion camera phone with 10000 GB of memory, 10 inch screen with 1024x768 resolution QVGA display, more themes than Windows XP and has WiFi coverage of over 50 miles!!!!!!". See how they do because of that?

Sure, technology has no direction but forward. However, I do not want to see phones as the direct competitors (or even replacements) of digital cameras, music players, computers, and gaming consoles. They may have advanced features but we need to take them into moderation. Ever wonder what the world would be if all of our devices are actually cellphones? Phones that bake cakes, phones that print photos, phones that transport you to work? Then if that happens, the real function of the phone will be obscured."

I did this over a year ago, when the iPhone was still a new thing in my country.
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 3:04 PM Post #67 of 80
I have some humble opinions. For I have been working for a cellphone manufacturer and familiar with the cell phone design.

The problem is on the manufacturers side. What the main purpose for the manufacturers is profit. They very "clever", their marketing department can smell the market trend,and tell the developing department to add in the non core functions. but the almost all the cellphone makers are not good at other non communication functions. normally they out source the non phone parts to add in their cellphone.

The cost pressure is their most concern, the cheapest hifi DAP will be a huge cost increased to any cellphone models. even increase 10 dollars cost is unacceptable. usually the cost of DAP partd in a cellphone is around 2-3 dollars. The result is the cellphone can only add in a cheap DAP function.

As a cellphone insider, the costs in the cellphone is very sensitive. For there are too much functions need costs: cellphone it'self ($15),cammera ($ 5), memory ($10), battery($5),Gps module($10), FM radio($3),case($5),earphone($1), Screen (best one $30), box($1) and DAP($3) labour($ 1), tax, profits(?) and developing fee.-----, my god, How much is to sum up all those for the costs?---the newest mainstream cellphons factory price should be near to $100- $150, How can they fix their retail price at USD 200? 300 is not possible. but who will like to pay $200 or $300for a decent cellphone? few. but to any models of cellphones, they need at least half million units to consume their initial investments. Appearantly, there is no half million audiophiles to buy their hifi celphone.

Even if they want to add in a good DAP function, but they really not the specialist of audio design. And the audio designer also not the expert of cellphone.

The most possible hifi phone is a DAP/ phone, than not Phone/DAP. which focus on DAP function, phone function is only an subordinative function.

Apple, Nokia can't finish the task for their have no qualification to design a hi end audio, even Sony is not qualification for their walkman phone is just so so.

I predict Cowon, Iriver, Hifiman and Hisoundaudio can do it. of course it is only an assumption.
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 3:15 PM Post #68 of 80
Quote:

Originally Posted by jjsoviet /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The phone of today is not as good as the phone of yesterday. It may have the most and best features but let's remember what phones are actually invented for. If you want something like that then don't say anymore that that thing is actually a phone. It's not a device in a phone, but a phone in a device.


Disagree, Nokia is an example of communication first and other functions second. Their telephony features are rock-solid and, to this generation, superior to the phones of yesteryear with comparable (or better) voice quality and reception.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatman /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The most possible hifi phone is a DAP/ phone, than not Phone/DAP. which focus on DAP function, phone function is only an subordinative function.

Apple, Nokia can't finish the task for their have no qualification to design a hi end audio, even Sony is not qualification for their walkman phone is just so so.

I predict Cowon, Iriver, Hifiman and Hisoundaudio can do it. of course it is only an assumption.



Disagree, the iPhone focuses on being a DAP rather than a phone. It sucks as a phone but rocks as a DAP. Apple has finished the task, as its newest iPhone sounds better than players from Cowon, iRiver, Meizu, perhaps more (not to mention virtually all other phones).
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 3:54 PM Post #69 of 80
Disagree, the iPhone focuses on being a DAP rather than a phone. It sucks as a phone but rocks as a DAP. Apple has finished the task, as its newest iPhone sounds better than players from Cowon, iRiver, Meizu, perhaps more (not to mention virtually all other phones).[/QUOTE]

Maybe your are right, I have no question to you. but to may ear, it is not a hifi player, sorry.
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 5:19 PM Post #70 of 80
Quote:

Originally Posted by fatman /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Maybe your are right, I have no question to you. but to may ear, it is not a hifi player, sorry.


What do you consider a "hifi" player? The only one I could think of in that category is that HifiMan DAP. Quite frankly everything else is just okay; if you want real hifi stay at home.

It honestly blows my mind that you put the 3GS in the same category as the music-oriented offerings from Nokia, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson (which are mostly mediocre). I'm not disagreeing with what you're hearing, I'm just totally puzzled at how you can do this.
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 5:50 PM Post #71 of 80
Quote:

Originally Posted by 3X0 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
What do you consider a "hifi" player? The only one I could think of in that category is that HifiMan DAP. Quite frankly everything else is just okay; if you want real hifi stay at home.

It honestly blows my mind that you put the 3GS in the same category as the music-oriented offerings from Nokia, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson (which are mostly mediocre). I'm not disagreeing with what you're hearing, I'm just totally puzzled at how you can do this.





I have just said it is my own ear's requirement. I didn't say you are wrong. Everybody have it's standard to the hifi criterion. I do agree there are a lot of people there said the IPOd,( including 3G) is very hifi player. this is the reason why APPLE don't want to upgrade their own sound quality. I remember ther marketing manager of IPOD has said the same word as you have said: if you want realy hifi, stay at home.

The time is tewenty one century, not 1997. the portable audio technology has a lot of creations.

AMP3 firstly appliys the Class A amp technology to DAP. you see,Class A Amp usually applying in the hi end audio system. who can say the hifi can be only hear from the home set up?

if you want to know something of the newest DAP technology, you can read this thread:
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f15/am...8/index65.html
 
Aug 29, 2009 at 11:45 PM Post #72 of 80
Quote:

Originally Posted by 3X0 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Disagree, Nokia is an example of communication first and other functions second. Their telephony features are rock-solid and, to this generation, superior to the phones of yesteryear with comparable (or better) voice quality and reception.


But then, why does Nokia shove phones with many applications like the NSeries? If their focus is on the core phone functions, why do they still develop their cameras, processors and other secondary functions?

And also, I don't believe that people buy those kinds of phones for mainly communication functions. Many actually buy just to have a digital camera, a music player and a web surfer than a phone. But that's just my opinion.
 
Aug 30, 2009 at 1:55 AM Post #73 of 80
Quote:

Originally Posted by jjsoviet /img/forum/go_quote.gif
But then, why does Nokia shove phones with many applications like the NSeries? If their focus is on the core phone functions, why do they still develop their cameras, processors and other secondary functions?

And also, I don't believe that people buy those kinds of phones for mainly communication functions. Many actually buy just to have a digital camera, a music player and a web surfer than a phone. But that's just my opinion.



Because their telephony features are perfect as it is. As you said, Nokia Nseries devices are phones first with the other features being subordinate.

Many people use the phones for convergence purposes as you mention in your second paragraph. But its phone features come first so that nothing else gets in the way.. it's a bona fide smartphone. Hence why Nokias don't have 10-14 megapixel cameras rivaling decent point and shoots, nor do they have powerful GPS chips capable of giving dedicated navigation units a run for their money. The secondary features (including sound quality) are compromised, but the phone aspect is absolutely not. If anything, it is strengthened by its being a smartphone.
 
Aug 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM Post #74 of 80
Quote:

Originally Posted by jbarbier /img/forum/go_quote.gif
you know, if you would have asked me this question about a year ago, i would have said "YES, DEFINITELY." but that was before i know that it was possible to get very good quality sound in such a portable size. i have a pretty nice dedicated home system with an awesome turntable, high-end speakers, amps, connects, etc, but when it came to portable music... i thought "iPod." i used to have a minidisc player, and while i REALLY liked it, the convenience factor of the iPod trumped it. now that i know what is possible for about $500 (less than what i paid for interconnects for my home system,) i'm not so sure that my iPod is so great after all.

a $75 sansa clip, $100 grados, $50-100 amp of your choice, plus ICs... that puts you in the game for mere pocket change, really. my system in my room cost about $4,000 and i can get nearly identical sound with a $300 dollar portable!? the killer though is that i can listen to my portable rig with headphones at ANY TIME. this is key since i like listening to music at night. wish i had known that a few years ago.

back to the topic though, when it comes to music, i'd like my DAP to do one thing and do it well instead of doing a lot of things decently. the iTouch is very close to doing everything great, but for simply enjoying music, it's overkill. a $50 sansa clip would sound better for like a fifth of the price.



As a matter a fact, I sold my Accuphase audio gear because was more happy with headphones... No neigbour trouble, listening in bed before going to sleep and even MP3's sounds good while on the stereo they lack someting...
 
Aug 30, 2009 at 12:11 PM Post #75 of 80
Quote:

Originally Posted by fatman /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I have some humble opinions. For I have been working for a cellphone manufacturer and familiar with the cell phone design.

The problem is on the manufacturers side. What the main purpose for the manufacturers is profit. They very "clever", their marketing department can smell the market trend,and tell the developing department to add in the non core functions. but the almost all the cellphone makers are not good at other non communication functions. normally they out source the non phone parts to add in their cellphone.

The cost pressure is their most concern, the cheapest hifi DAP will be a huge cost increased to any cellphone models. even increase 10 dollars cost is unacceptable. usually the cost of DAP partd in a cellphone is around 2-3 dollars. The result is the cellphone can only add in a cheap DAP function.

As a cellphone insider, the costs in the cellphone is very sensitive. For there are too much functions need costs: cellphone it'self ($15),cammera ($ 5), memory ($10), battery($5),Gps module($10), FM radio($3),case($5),earphone($1), Screen (best one $30), box($1) and DAP($3) labour($ 1), tax, profits(?) and developing fee.-----, my god, How much is to sum up all those for the costs?---the newest mainstream cellphons factory price should be near to $100- $150, How can they fix their retail price at USD 200? 300 is not possible. but who will like to pay $200 or $300for a decent cellphone? few. but to any models of cellphones, they need at least half million units to consume their initial investments. Appearantly, there is no half million audiophiles to buy their hifi celphone.

Even if they want to add in a good DAP function, but they really not the specialist of audio design. And the audio designer also not the expert of cellphone.

The most possible hifi phone is a DAP/ phone, than not Phone/DAP. which focus on DAP function, phone function is only an subordinative function.

Apple, Nokia can't finish the task for their have no qualification to design a hi end audio, even Sony is not qualification for their walkman phone is just so so.

I predict Cowon, Iriver, Hifiman and Hisoundaudio can do it. of course it is only an assumption.




What you have said applies true for mp3 players as well.
But technology had improved so much you guys probably didn't notice.

From disc players to mp3 players, the beginning of the mp3 era marked the birth of a multi-function device already.

Lets say the newer mp3 models, creative zii, zune HD, x1060, samsung p3 and cowon s9. They ALL operate on an software with hardware such as cpu and ram. Looking at those mp3 i mentioned, they all have extra built in features, such as internet browser, video player, wifi etc.

So, Why Not? Make calls and sms inside these devices you see, such as x1060 and cowon s9. And when you do add in call and sms functions, what you get, is the cellphones we get now, samsung omnia, iphone, n97 etc.

After listening to how well my samsung does, i've sold my sony x1060. i don't hear much of an difference between the two except that my sony x1060 has better musical functions and equiliser. But i don't need it, my samsung sound roughtly the same as my sony, so why keep my sony player when it would only make my trouses fatter?

And we're not even talking about different companies here.

The companies that makes digital media players/mp3 players mostly do make cellphones as well. Such as samsung and sony. So the moment you say these manufacturers doesn't focus on sound quality, you're wrong. They make excellent mp3 players people, they know all about sound quality, it isn't at all tough to built-in a good dac and amp into a High end cellphone.

It won't be about cellphones now and in the future, but about portability and combining all functions into a smart device. And technology does make things smaller. So much u could combine an dslr/mp3/pda into a smart device easily.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top