Apodizing filter

Oct 6, 2024 at 9:38 PM Post #347 of 426
i mean just let us imagine my ABX is "real" (which its, but surely bigshot thinks it was faked)

1. either phaseshift was audible
2. frequency response
3. actual frequencys above 22khz that got nicely filtered by the low pass were audible
(4. possibility - fake)
 
Oct 6, 2024 at 9:39 PM Post #348 of 426
This guy is on my ‘Ignore’ list because of his obsessive argumentative nature which he consistently displayed on the HD600 thread.
Huh? you mean me? which HD600 thread lol
 
Oct 6, 2024 at 9:48 PM Post #349 of 426
Old grouchy Bob is referring to me with the HD600 comment.

He objected to a person discussing something that was marginally off topic, I suggested it wasn't a big deal and perhaps he could stop playing forum police but grouchy Bob didn't like that and grizzled to the admin and then blocked me, storm in a tea cup but fine by me.
 
Last edited:
Oct 6, 2024 at 9:49 PM Post #350 of 426
inaudible range are two stark words btw, some audiophiles suspect maybe inaudible for your ears but frequencys above 20khz can be still "perceived"

do you wanna take the blue or red pill ? :D

The thing is both sides are purple pilled hehe (none are absolute truths since science is still in progress)
 
Oct 6, 2024 at 9:52 PM Post #351 of 426
Sometimes I think this is a forum for nut jobs, not home audio. It doesn’t matter though. I find both to be interesting. If someone posts boloney about audio in an eccentric manner, I can try to figure out their mental disorder. That’s fun too. We need a bingo card.
 
Oct 6, 2024 at 9:55 PM Post #352 of 426
This guy is on my ‘Ignore’ list because of his obsessive argumentative nature which he consistently displayed on the HD600 thread.

Good on you Bob, I think that description is a bit of a stretch, I enjoyed a debate with a couple of other gents about the merits of an OTL amplifier then you played forum police. I am sure you see it very differently and that is fine by me.
 
Oct 6, 2024 at 10:09 PM Post #356 of 426
Yay! We’ve all degenerated in a delightful manner.
 
Oct 7, 2024 at 2:23 AM Post #357 of 426
comes from long listening sessions vs rapid back and forth switching..... one of the flaws of DBT
Oh good, even more BS! Firstly, rapid switching back and forth is not a “flaw of DBT” it’s a strength and secondly, there is no time limit on a DBT/ABX, you can compare long listening sessions if you want! Jeez, why do you keep making this BS up and then not understand that is NOT acceptable in a science discussion forum??
its not like i never tested stuff myself https://www.audiocheck.net/blindtests_level.php 0,5db is easy, it gets interesting if you test 0,2db
I can do that too, test something completely different and then use it to make a false claim. I once tested a Ferrari against a VW Polo, so that proves I can hear bat echolocation signals at 100kHz. See, it’s easy … it’s also complete BS!
i probably missed the mark at 0,5db at 20khz but (in my book) this is close enough and you would say anyway its not audible...
Your book is making up BS and then arguing fallacies to defend it but you repeatedly seem to miss the fact that this is the Sound Science forum and not your book, even though it says so in bold at the top of the page! We say it’s not audible because it is not audible, ~130 years of scientific testing has proven that and you now seem to be back peddling on your false claim after pages of defending it with nothing but fallacies! 1+1 does not equal 5 (except in your nonsense book) and your test or any other properly performed test obviously cannot demonstrate that it does.

What is the null test difference between your two files? You are not testing what you think you are testing because if you were, you would not hear a difference because a fraction of a dB difference at 20kHz is inaudible, just as 1+1 does not equal 5! Why don’t you try learning some facts for a change instead of continuously making up BS and then posting it in a science discussion forum of all places?!

G
 
Oct 7, 2024 at 5:18 AM Post #358 of 426
I can see why he is so ignorant about this subject. He refuses to listen or learn from others. He’s willfully choosing to be ignorant. There’s a word for that…
 
Oct 7, 2024 at 5:34 AM Post #359 of 426
hmm will do a mp3 vs flac blindtest next ;)
 
Oct 7, 2024 at 6:00 AM Post #360 of 426
Screenshot from 2024-10-07 11-57-37.png


probably could have picked a better song for this one but whatever :)
yep only 67% accuracy, but 33 samples... it was basicly my first test i continued to do

audacity mp3 export setting was "insane/320kbit"

(in my book) you guys are full of crap :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top