gimmeheadroom
Headphoneus Supremus
Well, this is new. In the old days (I've been into audio since the 1960s) there were always measurement reports, but nobody, and I mean nobody! ever thought to reject the listening part as the main significant part of the review. The measurements were to try to expose any sonic issues that might concern the buyer and give an overall sense of the sound curve.That's you specifically, but just as you mention that "some" objectivists will reject everything if not shown in a measurement, some subjectivists will reject all measurements. The problem is the extreme end of both sides IMO. And boths sides do have an extreme end, it might not be you or anyone else contributing to this tread, but they are out there. Just like there are those the reject everything if it isn't measured.
What's new with audioscientology is the total rejection of how gear sounds as irrevelant. And that is simply brainless, given hifi is about enjoying the sound of the music.
I assert that people who have not used and heard the gear are in no position to discuss its merits or shortcomings. And that applies to any sensory thing there is. For example, are there art critics who do a scientific analysis on paintings and tell you this is good, this is bad, and whoever likes it is an idiot / genius etc.?
Delusion, not science.
Bottom line is everybody has the right to like or not like something. But they don't have the right to insult, attack, etc. people who like or don't like what's on their (most likely sponsored) position based on 0 listening experience.