Quote:
Originally posted by Nick Dangerous
I'd like to hear a review of these cans. I did not like the W100 when I last tried them. |
I'd love to borrow a pair to review, since I never respected AT gear before and wasn't aware of AT's Japan-only high-end fare. I listen to and play most styles of music, being a broken-in studio ho, but what I prefer is IDM, dub and deep minimal techno for empty pleasure, and medieval and dissonant twentieth century classical music for complexity and depth. From the reviews I've read, the AT-w100 and ti100 are particularly suited to classical.
I've always wondered why people listen to full-on orchestras to judge a particular kind of headphone. Seems to me you can tell more about accuracy by listening to a single instrument: Christine Schaefer's a capella sprechstimmung in Pierrot Lunaire, for example, or your favorite cellist playing the scordatura sarabande from Bach Cello Suite No. 5 (cello is particularly good if you're checking digital depth in a recording, since every strike of the bow involves high and low attack transients).
But loaned ti100s aren't going to appear in my PO Box any time soon and, unfortunately, I don't happen to live in Dallas.
Also, I'm hesitant about buying expensive headphones without hearing them first. I don't really trust other people's opinions on headphones. With the ER 4P/S, I was able to go to the store with my own PCDP and A/B them with the ER 6 (no comparison, really).
Magicthyse: I was really hoping you'd respond to my questions by ennumerating the manly virtues of silver and why you gravitate toward that color with every headphone purchase (but go light on the teabagging references). What kind of truss-sporting funster are you, anyway? (Keep in mind I'm merely joshing, riffing, grendeling. These are the jokes or -- as your people refer to them -- brafs, toynbees, dinkle-phay-phays.)