Quote:
Regarding the E9 and reliability; Amazon does sell it, and they're generally great for returns/replacements within their window. IME most failures happen in that first month anyways (and I've had no issues with my E9, for whatever that's worth - had it for a while). Just to chime in from the other side; again, if the Schiit has relays and that DC thing was a fluke, I've got no complaints on reliability there - if $250 vs $120 is what you gotta do for peace of mind, that's really not that bad! Especially if their CS is good and they honor their warranty (I have no idea if they do or don't, and have no reason to believe they don't, if they were willing to fix a production flaw for early units; that's leaning me towards "yeah this is a good warranty") - I only bring this up because some warranties are a joke (in other words, do your homework; for all I know Fiio doesn't honor their warranties, or whatever else - if it's something you feel you'll be using, read up on it).
Absolutely +1 on Amazon selling Fiio. I probably wouldn't have bought Fiio by reputation if it weren't sold by Amazon, but I bought it, haven't had any trouble with any of it (knock wood!)
As for Schiit, yes, all the current stuff has the relays (I say current because I have a sneaking suspicion one or both of the up-coming levels of products won't, by design, to appease the audiophile customers that will be willing to spend probably $1000+ on it. Fair enough if that's what customers at that price point want.) While I don't have any warranty experience with them myself yet, and I haven't actually heard many reports of folks needing warranty service on them yet (which is always good, the best warranty is the one you never need!) My CS experience with them, personally has been great (most emails are returned within minutes to a few hours), and all reports in the related threads here from those who have needed service have resulted in extreme praise for the level of service. So from a service perspective there's certainly value there. I agree with you about most warranties. For most products I ignore the warranty entirely and have no plans of using it even if the item fails. The half-broken refurb you get back from most companies as your "replacement" or the shoddy repair (after spending $30 sending it back and waiting a month for turn-around nullifies any value to most warranties to me.) This is one of the few that I'd consider a real warranty in the old sense of the word.
True story: LaCIE, famed for selling professional graphics design related computer equipment, sells a monitor for somewhere around $3000 for professional graphics. It's a wide gamut, large, color calibration supported monitor for when real color matters. It's just a re-badged NEC that runs for $1300. Same exact hardware. The absolute only difference other than the name is the warranty and the fact that they unpack every single one and test it for dead pixels before repacking and shipping it. For some, $1700 for that is insanity. For others its essential. Everyone's needs create different value. Another monitor company sells extended warranties. It's 1-year out of the box. The 4 year extended cost about $400. For actual warranty policies, it seems clear that long warranties do drive up the cost by surprising margins at times, partially from profit padding, and partially from loss mitigation.
Quote:
Again, I'm not saying there's no differences and that gear doesn't matter on any level - I've never said that. What I am saying is that those differences are generally going to be inaudible, or so minor that you won't even pick them out unless you're doing a direct ABX - like the impedance matching argument; sure with some cases with some loads you will get FR deviation, which you won't know about unless you're measuring it with an audio analyzer or AB'ing with something else (and have controlled for all your other variables). Someone else said it earlier: worry less, listen to more music. That's roughly my philosophy on this whole thing - "good enough is really good enough."
Actually, I agree with you mostly with many differences only being able to be
distinctly picked out by doing a direct ABX. But I think the one missing element there is harder to quantify, and is one that drives a lot of upgradeitis here. The "perception" of the things you're missing, you know you're missing "something" but can't put a finger on the
distinct problem without ABXing. This happened to me with my old loudspeaker setup DAC. I'd often listen to it and it sounded great, but sometimes I'd just not enjoy an album as much as I thought I would, or tired of it fast, etc. I listened closely and could not identify what was wrong...there seemed to be nothing wrong. At some point I introduced another DAC into the mix. It actually had to do with inputs, not SQ. By chance I found I wasn't tiring of some of those albums as much. I didn't really link the two together until I realized that I was mostly using the new DAC. Niether of them was an exceptional piece of hardware, none of it boutique, all pretty average stuff. After doing a blind ABX on them the distinct differences were apparent while they were not when listening separately. The one was comparatively rubbish.
The moral of the story is, just because you can't identify the differences between two pieces of equipment unless you intentionally ABX them at the same time, it doesn't mean you're still not perceiving those differences through greater or lesser enjoyment of the music over an extended listening session. In that sense I think the idea of "critical listening" to identify detail in hardware is a flawed logic from the start. In some cases just "listening to music for a while" is a much better test of how you really enjoy the output from a given setup. In critical listening you're trying to hear the frequency, the attack, the pacing, the jitter, the whatever. In just listening your brain just tells you "I like this, I want to do nothing but sit and listen all day, forget food and sleep!" or "I guess it's ok, can I go do something else now? I'm bored with this song, lets change the track!"