Quote:
DETAIL. MAD DETAIL AND TREBLE |
Vertigo,
This doesn't sound like the Earmax, somehow. The Earmax seems to be about things like musical accuracy, liquidity, low-level linearity, micro-dynamics, ambience, timbral fidelity, homogenousness, and bass extension. A solid state amp like the Sugden or a JMT might be more to your liking. I don't know whether introducing a transformer into the RKV's signal path would be a solution either. After all, some of the RKV's superior musicality is probably due to its OTL design.
The lowest impedance phone I have tried with the Earmax Pro hass been a Grado SR-125. There was no hiss, but I found the treble to be really annoying and over-emphasized. I thought this was simply the Grado sound I didn't like. The lowest impedance phone I have used extensively (for more than a year) with the Earmax is the Audio Technica ATH-A5, a closed design with 60 Ohms and 100dB/mW sensitivity. Again: not a trace of hiss and more bass extension, slam, body and presence than with the Senns HD 580/600. To me, the Earmax is dead silent. markl has been more critical of its performance with low impedance phones, but I wonder whether this might be attributable to his 110 volt version.
Themegifts seem to think that it works great with the ol' King o' phones, but the R10 has a nominal impedance of 40 Ohms, might be even lower at some frequencies. On the other hand, if you can return the Earmax: what is the risk? And, before all: I would like to read your review comparing the RKV and the Earmax, of course.