AKG K1000's are a DYNAMIC headphone
Apr 1, 2007 at 12:24 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 17

F1GTR

Banned
Joined
May 18, 2004
Posts
1,738
Likes
11
As in dynamic and electrostatic. I just had to get that out there in an effort to cure some of the unawareness/ignorance that I've seen from some relatively new and older users recently. Over the past few weeks I've read a number of threads where they continue to be referred to as an electrostat and that is obviously not the case.

The following specifications are from the AKG K1000 manual:

* Type: Dynamic Transducer with VLD magnet

* Rated Impedance 120 ohms

* Sensitivity: 74db for 1 mW (free field)

* Power requirement: 100 mW for 1 Pa

* Power rating: 1000 mW—approximately 104 db

* Headband force exerted on a 140mm wide head: 3.5N

* Weight: 370 g including 8 foot cord and XLR connector

* Frequency range: 30 Hz to 25,000 Hz
 
Apr 1, 2007 at 12:30 AM Post #2 of 17
Quote:

Originally Posted by F1GTR /img/forum/go_quote.gif
As in dynamic and electrostatic. I just had to get that out there in an effort to cure some of the unawareness/ignorance that I've seen from some relatively new and older users recently. Over the past few weeks I've read a number of threads where they continue to be referred to as an electrostat and that is obviously not the case.

The following specifications are from the AKG K1000 manual:

* Type: Dynamic Transducer with VLD magnet

* Rated Impedance 120 ohms

* Sensitivity: 74db for 1 mW (free field)

* Power requirement: 100 mW for 1 Pa

* Power rating: 1000 mW—approximately 104 db

* Headband force exerted on a 140mm wide head: 3.5N

* Weight: 370 g including 8 foot cord and XLR connector

* Frequency range: 30 Hz to 25,000 Hz



Dynamic would be correct..
 
Apr 1, 2007 at 6:58 AM Post #3 of 17
Quote:

Originally Posted by F1GTR /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Over the past few weeks I've read a number of threads where they continue to be referred to as an electrostat and that is obviously not the case.


Dynamic it is!
k1000smile.gif

Anybody referring to the K1000 as electrostatics don't know what they are talking about.
 
Apr 1, 2007 at 7:28 AM Post #6 of 17
Yeah, I was confused at first too, due to the size, shape and characteristics that ppl described, but then i googled.
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Apr 1, 2007 at 10:08 AM Post #9 of 17
Yeah, the plug tends to throw people off with the K1000. We usually associate pin plugs with 'stats. As far as I know, the K1000 is the only dynamic single ended headphone that's like that.
 
Apr 1, 2007 at 10:20 AM Post #10 of 17
This is all a bunch of filthy lies and frankly, I'm ashamed and offended to see our head-fi degraded in such a manner.

The real specs for the K1000s are as follows;

* Type: Electrostatic Transducer with copper mesh stators

* Rated Impedance 120kohms

* Sensitivity: 74db at 100V r.m.s (at 1kHz)

* Biasing voltage: 860VDC

* Headband force exerted on a 140mm wide head: 3.5N

* Weight: 370 g including 2.5m PC-OCC cable

* Operating temperature: 0-40℃, bellow 90% humidity

* Frequency range: 7 Hz to 55,000 Hz
 
Apr 1, 2007 at 10:28 AM Post #11 of 17
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl /img/forum/go_quote.gif
This is all a bunch of filthy lies and frankly, I'm ashamed and offended to see our head-fi degraded in such a manner.


Carl, don't make us gang up on you and call you Australian, 'coz we will
very_evil_smiley.gif
 
Apr 1, 2007 at 10:31 AM Post #12 of 17
Quote:

Originally Posted by smeggy /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Carl, don't make us gang up on you and call you Australian, 'coz we will
very_evil_smiley.gif



Struth, if ya do that cozza I'll call you a Canadian. Fair dinkum.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top