Quote:
Originally posted by Mike Scarpitti
My belief is that Stax open structure prevents the reinforcement that a closed type phone provides in the bass, but that these closed units also suffer from some distortion and resonances also, which is heard by the ear/brain as "more bass", but is really just noise. |
I would not say more bass is always just noise.
Perhaps a particular transducer is just more efficient at a particular frequency ,which may well excite things [enclosure ,cavity etc]producing more distortion at that particular frequency.
I have done a fair bit of experimenting with bass on those
ribbon transducers of mine ,all the way from way too much to way too little.
Whilst bass can be boosted with cavity/enclosure tuning etc it can
also be a product of diaphragm excursion.[the ribbons are an open design]
All things being correct, [hmm,never really a possibility in any design] to my ear the effect of elevated excursion at low frequency seemed to bring the bass sources closer to the listener,
I remember with one rather excessive setting I felt I was
sat by a drum kit playing double bass,nice but not 'correct'.
Lots of excursion obviously can if too high cause upsets to other
frequency's by modulating them with the LF components.
I adore my Stax phones and have had little experience with other
phones compared to many here[my dynamics,non planar types are a pair of Beyer DT931s used in my portable rig].
But I do often find myself preferring concussive crack of a rim-shot
on the ribbons compared to the stax.
I suppose it is kind of irrelevant comparing and citing my Diy jobs
in comparison to the Staxs here as no one here has heard them but
from my perspective it is quite novel being able to actually change
a transducers sound as oppose to comparing factory with factory.
Setmenu