babyoh
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Posts
- 357
- Likes
- 23
Is upgrading to Equinox cable an absolute must or the leaness / metallic quality can easily tamed with a good tube amp?
Originally Posted by Canman /img/forum/go_quote.gif One more for the stock cable sounding just fine. When I had an equinox tail end cable, I thought it made the K1000 sound worse. The hardwired version may sound better but I have never tried it. |
Originally Posted by Canman /img/forum/go_quote.gif One more for the stock cable sounding just fine. When I had an equinox tail end cable, I thought it made the K1000 sound worse. The hardwired version may sound better but I have never tried it. |
Originally Posted by Uncle Erik /img/forum/go_quote.gif What leanness and metallic sound? I've never heard that on a K-1000. You'll probably want to try a different amp - the K-1000 is extremely revealing of an amp's character. I run mine connected either to a Conrad-Johnson MV52 or to the speaker taps on a Moth Si2A3. You can clearly hear the difference between an EL34 and a 2A3. My K-1000 is dead stock and I use the stock pigtail. I'm not a cable believer, and I haven't heard anything from the K-1000 that would suggest it is being held back. I would also advise against recabling for practical reasons. The K-1000 is a difficult recable, with a fair chance of damaging the voicecoils or leads. Last I heard, AKG had no replacement drivers and no longer services the K-1000. If you, or someone else, fries a voice coil, you'll have to buy another pair. The risk is not worth it. |
Originally Posted by babyoh /img/forum/go_quote.gif The Equinox tail end cable made the K1000 sound worse in what ways? |
Originally Posted by babyoh /img/forum/go_quote.gif Is upgrading to Equinox cable an absolute must or the leaness / metallic quality can easily tamed with a good tube amp? |