Rob80b
Headphoneus Supremus
All this continuing interest in the K501’s and also the HD580’s only reminds us that both these cans were and appear (in hindsight) to be landmarks in quality headphones. Both have been out for a number of years and are still appreciated. Yes they can now be got for a reasonable price, but not to forget they were both flagships for the audiophile and at the time of release priced accordingly, outside the AKG K1000’s and the Sennheiser Orpheus.
Headphone research and development are probably not a high priority for either manufacturer and it is interesting neither have a representative on these forms, contrary to Grado and a lot of the amp designers from Meier-Audio, Headamp, Ray Samuels and HeadRoom to name a few.
The K501’s were my first choice after joining headfi and the HD580’s my second.
Both specialize in microphones and it only makes sense they that their transducers were further developed to give the listener the best monitoring devices at the end of the chain, “the Headphone”. Fashion was not what they had in mind although both have a plethora of lower end cans to fill the consumers needs, maybe too many.
Taking in their perspective sound the K501’s and HD580’s came out before the majority of folks got into Home Theatre augmented with subwoofers. So at that time the K501’s were developed their bass was more than adequate and probably correct for most, although the majority of headfiers now agree that the last part of the bottom octave appears to be missing, regardless of amplification.
The Senn house sound on the other hand is darker but with better bass extension.
So what I’m getting at is that manufactures are now catering to what’s in, more deeper bass (HD650’s) maybe extended highs (k601’s/K701’s?) but at the possible determent of neutrality, which I think leads us back to why there is a continuing interest in the K501’s and HD580’s, two honest cans representing the perspective designs of both manufactures.
What’s new is not necessarily better.
Just some thoughts!
Headphone research and development are probably not a high priority for either manufacturer and it is interesting neither have a representative on these forms, contrary to Grado and a lot of the amp designers from Meier-Audio, Headamp, Ray Samuels and HeadRoom to name a few.
The K501’s were my first choice after joining headfi and the HD580’s my second.
Both specialize in microphones and it only makes sense they that their transducers were further developed to give the listener the best monitoring devices at the end of the chain, “the Headphone”. Fashion was not what they had in mind although both have a plethora of lower end cans to fill the consumers needs, maybe too many.
Taking in their perspective sound the K501’s and HD580’s came out before the majority of folks got into Home Theatre augmented with subwoofers. So at that time the K501’s were developed their bass was more than adequate and probably correct for most, although the majority of headfiers now agree that the last part of the bottom octave appears to be missing, regardless of amplification.
The Senn house sound on the other hand is darker but with better bass extension.
So what I’m getting at is that manufactures are now catering to what’s in, more deeper bass (HD650’s) maybe extended highs (k601’s/K701’s?) but at the possible determent of neutrality, which I think leads us back to why there is a continuing interest in the K501’s and HD580’s, two honest cans representing the perspective designs of both manufactures.
What’s new is not necessarily better.
Just some thoughts!