bik2101
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2009
- Posts
- 1,164
- Likes
- 10
I've been looking around on fs/ft forums and seen quite a few variations on the the akg 240.. i was wondering what the difference between all of them are.
Originally Posted by lejaz /img/forum/go_quote.gif I agree with rhythmdevils, that the mkII variations seem like a marketing ploy to give the impression that the k240S was updated, when in fact the only difference is two sets of pads and two cables instead of one of each. |
Originally Posted by lejaz /img/forum/go_quote.gif How does the sound change going from pleather to velour? I'm wondering if I should give the velour a try, but first I'm curious if there is an improvement in the boomy low end, or in any other area. |
Originally Posted by lejaz /img/forum/go_quote.gif How does the sound change going from pleather to velour? I'm wondering if I should give the velour a try, but first I'm curious if there is an improvement in the boomy low end, or in any other area. |
Originally Posted by lejaz /img/forum/go_quote.gif Good info thanks. Then, the velour would only make things worse if used with the k240S(bass is so boomy already), but might be good to try with the k240DF....which could benefit from a bit more warmth and bass with some material. |
Originally Posted by krmathis /img/forum/go_quote.gif Perhaps because AKG have been producing the K240 over several decades, and during these years felt the urge to perform modifications to it? Hence creating many variations.. |