About Burn In. No, I'm not asking if it's real.
Dec 5, 2008 at 9:16 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 4

FYDave

Banned
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Posts
163
Likes
0
I'm just wondering how this idea came about.

Does anyone have any idea where the idea of burn in came from originally? It certainly seems to cause quite a stir all around town.
 
Dec 5, 2008 at 9:23 AM Post #2 of 4
Burn-in in speakers with dynamic drivers is well documented, and has been known about for a long time. It's proven since speaker FR can be measured accurately. No, I'm not going to bother looking up references to back those statements up.

I'm guessing it's been simply transplanted into the headphone world.

I've heard the effects of burn-in, but its importance is usually vastly over-exaggerated here on HF. Not every driver benefits from it equally, and balanced armatures in my experience don't burn in at all.
 
Dec 5, 2008 at 9:34 AM Post #3 of 4
Okay. So that would also mean that, because I believe that the Super.fi 5's and 4's have armatures, they also shouldn't be subject to burn in according to what you're saying, right?
 
Dec 5, 2008 at 11:30 AM Post #4 of 4
Balanced armatures in my experience does affect by burn-in, but only limits to early batch SA6 (later batches are all run-in by Sleek Audio for QC purpose, thus the effect is not observed by the users anymore). I do agree that not every driver benefits from it equally.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top