A review of X-Feed (Standalone crossfeed)
Mar 1, 2003 at 11:23 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 165

wordsworth

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Dec 7, 2002
Posts
424
Likes
10
A review of X-Feed

X-Feed has been designed and built by PinkFloyd (head-fi.org member)

X-feed as you might have guessed is a crossfeed device. What makes this different to other crossfeed devices is that it works as a passive (not power supply needed) standalone device and has nothing fancy, simply RCA in and RCA out. The X-feed is also small and very sturdy.

My test kit is:
Philips 963SA (Upsampled to 192)
Supermini v5 12 volt walwart
HD580
Ety ER4P
Cambridge Audio “Pacific” 1m Interconnect
Thor 3m interconnect

Test Music
Beatles - “the blue album” 1967 -1970
Michael Nyman – The Essential Michael Nyman Band
Doves – The Last Broadcast
Jan Garbarek & The Hilliard Ensemble – Officium

As this is a “quick” review it will only be selected tracks from the above. And of course all my views are based on my equipment with my own ears. Please also take into account that the Thor interconnect and Cambridge audio interconnect sound very different and having to use them together could effect the overall sound.


The Essential Michael Nyman Band and The X-Feed Effect:

First up is The Essential Michael Nyman Band. If you are unfamiliar with his work, he wrote the piano soundtrack and is considered a “minimalist” composer. He uses amped instruments along with violins, cellos and saxophones. The music tends to be very rhythmic and pulsing. The instruments tend to play overlapping tunes in a repetitive fashion which leads to very complicated music.

With the x-feed the sound becomes lighter more airy with a more cohesive feel. However the sound does not push at you like before or extenuate individual instruments reducing a small amount of detail. The sound no longer craves your attention so much and becomes less heavy and pressurised. You honestly feel you could listen for hours. So if you are reading a book or working you can have great sounding music that doesn’t distract you quite as much. With The Essential Michael Nyman Band you do lose a little of the feel for the rhythmic pulse and complexity of the music but it becomes easier it listen to for prolonged periods. However if you want to listen to just the music and hear every detail and feel the push and weight of the music then you will enjoy it more without the x-feed

Doves – The Last Broadcast and The X-Feed Effect:

The last broadcast is a rhythmic indie sound. Again like Nyman it has repetitive themes. The drums and guitar are quite important in this type of music as it is used to create the infectious rhythm.


With the X-feed you can notice a slight reduction in volume, however in my case this could be down to using 2 differing interconnects. With The Last Broadcast some of the darkness it lost and you do miss some of the forcefulness of the music. Again you get the benefits of reduced separateness of the instruments, but you do miss the effect of the drums and guitar working in harmony to create the driving rhythms. I feel you are less likely to feel the benefits of the x-feed with this type of music. But the x-feed does reduce the likelihood of headphone fatigue.


Jan Garbarek & The Hilliard Ensemble – Officium and The X-Feed Effect:

Officium is Gregorian Chart sung by The Hilliard Ensemble with Jan Garbarek playing Saxophone. I always enjoy the mix of the 2 sounds. The group harmonies of the vocals with the almost freeform of the sax. I always felt it had an almost eastern sound that relaxes whilst still making you pay attention to the music.

When you add the X-feed the sound of the Hilliard Ensemble and the Sax seem to come more together, not just positionally but harmonically. The sound is smoother and loses some of that eastern feel. But the sound is gentler which soothes and relaxes. However I feel the X-feed has changed the vocals, leading to a loss in much of the echo that comes from singing in a large cathedral. Personally I believe the music is better without the x-feed.


Beatles - “the blue album” 1967 -1970 and The X-Feed Effect:

Well most of you should know the Beatles so not much of an introduction. However it is important to remember that the Beatles material is recorded in the early days of stereo and so it suffers from quite an extreme form of stereo with overlapping sounds happing in isolation through both channels.

Well this is where you thank god for the x-feed. It truly comes into its own with extreme stereo recordings. The instruments suddenly become closer and more harmonious. The instruments still come through on the channel they were on before but seem to be now at the front of soundstage (head) instead of at the sides. Truly these pieces of music have to be listened to with a crossfeed, it just makes them so much more enjoyable and gives a greater feel for the music as a whole. I definitely recommend the x-feed when used with music containing extreme stereo.

Conclusion:

Well I have hoped to show a rounded view with different types of music though I am aware that some of the negative elements I noticed with the x-feed could have been produced by having to use the Cambridge Audio interconnect.

What is apparent from the results to me is that using a crossfeed is very beneficial to certain types of music, namely those from the sixties that contain more extreme stereo. But also that using the x-feed can also depend on your environment and whether you wish to make the music less distracting and reduce headphone fatigue, as would often be the case at work.

What makes the x-feed special is that it is standalone, very solid, passive, can work with any amp or source and importantly the cost. Buying a specialist amp with crossfeed can cost a bit and limit you to using that amp, however with the x-feed the cost is only £35 (about $55 - $60, at time of writing) shipped and it has no dependency on any one amp. For what it offers in sound and flexibility it is a great buy and I believe everyone should have one tucked away somewhere ready for use on those fatiguing albums or for work. All in all I thoroughly recommend it.

Thanks for reading this, it is not the best review but I am sure others that have bought the x-feed will add there own comments and probably articulate them much better.

In an attempt to explain how it changes the sound I have included 2 very basic images representing the sound of Eleanor Rigby without x-feed and with x-feed.

attachment.php


Wordsworth
 
Mar 1, 2003 at 11:48 PM Post #3 of 165
Just check my Cambridge Audio Cable with Officium without the x-feed and it also had a reduction in the big cathedral sound (the non x-feed tests were done with the Thor interconnect) which leads me to believe that some of what I heard with the X-feed is down to the cables. As I have a mixed setup without currently a home amp (awaiting delivery) I am hoping someone with a better setup with be able to give a more accurate view of the x-feed.

Also as a rule I really enjoy using the x-feed and often leave it in regardless of the music I am playing as I believe in most cases the benefits definetly outweigh any negaive aspects.

Wordsworth
 
Mar 2, 2003 at 1:49 AM Post #4 of 165
How much does it cost, and where does one buy it?


Thanks for the review BTW.
 
Mar 4, 2003 at 6:56 PM Post #9 of 165
I've got Echoes so I will have to try it on that. I agree with what you said pinkfloyd, on many pieces of music you won't lose anything using an x-feed but gain a considerable reduction in headphone fatigue. Some other pieces of music you might loose something but it will never be to considerable and the benefits (especially if you plan to listen to your headphones for a lonf time) will often outweigh what you loose. As it is standalone you can use it on any amp, which maybe at work or only for particular albums, its up to you.

Wordsworth
 
Mar 4, 2003 at 10:11 PM Post #12 of 165
I have to agree with Wordsworth totally. The X- Feed makes an amazing difference to Beatles listening, even to an amateur like myself :) Mike (Pink Floyd) has created an amazing little gadget which really and truly works. Well Done PF , every headphone user should have one of these :)
tongue.gif
 
Mar 5, 2003 at 1:33 AM Post #13 of 165
When Mike announced he had been working on a crossfeed filter specifically
designed to be used with Musical Fidelity's X-Cans series one thought came
to my mind, "Must Have." In my set up, I had been using the Jan Meir circuit
from the Headwise projects site, "An Enhanced-Bass Natural Crossfeed
Filter," for the past few years. Paradoxically, this seemed to make
headphone listening more enjoyable, less fatiguing but with a small trade
off in overall sound quality. Instead of the flat imaging headphones
sometimes offer, the Meir filter subtly brought the imaging to the front of
your head, albeit with a vastly reduced soundstage. However, the music lost
none of it's emotional impact, & I just plugged it in & forgot about it
until I read intriguingly about Mike's X-Feed.
Now, logic dictates that any filter & every mechanical & electrical
connection installed in the audio signal path has a detrimental effect on
sound quality but as most headphone users know, an important factor in
listening enjoyment is presentation & comfort. Basically, it's no use having
a superb sounding pair of cans if you have to take them off after fifteen
minutes suffering a headache. So, as with most things in life, an acceptable
compromise is the order of the day. The question was, how much of a compromises would the X-Feed be?
Well, rest assured, listening to music through headphones via the X-Feed is a
musical pleasure. In fact to my ears it's very close to using no crossfeed
installed, without the aforementioned listener fatigue. Subjectively, the
soundstage seems vast, very spatial with superior well focused three
dimensional stereo images. The stereo spread does exactly that but ever so
slightly in front of the normal headphone listening soundstage. It doesn't
seem to colour the sound & music flows with drive, sounding better sorted.
You get the impression that instruments & voices sound just as rich & smooth
with better separation. The insertion loss of this filter is very low & this
inspires confidence in it's potential matching capabilities. No fatigue
perceptible when grooving for long periods either.
As an afterthought, the only reservation I have with the X-Feed is a slight
trade off with bass performance. The bass seems less powerful & less
enriched with detail & slam. Knowing Mike, he'll be hard at work perfecting
a 'Bass Enhanced" version of the product. However, judging by the X-Feed's
reasonable cost & attractive results I was correct in assuming "Must Have."
The X-Feed was a must have before I had it & it's a must have in my system
now I've got it. As headphone listening accessories go this is one that
really works. I would encourage you to try this little wonder."
5 / 5 sound for the pound rating.
Nigel.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top