budx3385
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2005
- Posts
- 547
- Likes
- 34
My brand new balanced Sonett arrived 2 wks ago,and I listened for a while and let it run a day and listened again. It was clear, quiet, dry and distant, lacking in detail, timbre and presence. Even after running a couple days, The switchcraft XLR sockets were really tight - it was hard, no, very hard to remove any plugs, especially Xhadows - but I persisted and now it's better.
Then I remembered that the head-fi DNA Sonett review thread
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/493097/dna-sonett-review
suggested rolling the tubes, so I visited tubeworld.com and bought a cryo'd 1991 Russian NOS 6H30-DR Kuhltube for $175. Within 2 hr after it warmed up, the DNA headphone amp sounded fuller, cleaner, "mo' better", with much more detail and much better timbre. It really went up a notch. I listened with different headphones -- LA7000, HD800 w V3 silver dragon, Terminator (((V4))) w 600 ohm drivers -- and it was really better. I emailed Donald and congratulated him on a real world-class top-quality headphone amp.
Yet, it was no competition to the solid state, 3x more costly, Rudistor RP010B mark 2 for palpable presence - Rudi's amp is truly outstanding. So I looked at the confusing array of 5AR4/GZ34 tubes that tubeworld offers - wow, prices just keep going and going. I emailed Brenden for advice and he let me have the last cryo'd 1966 Mullard kuhltube for $220 - still in the lower third of the price range but similar to tubes mentioned here. I installed that yesterday and SHAZAM!!! The DNA became amazing - clarity, fullness, frequency extension, balance, and as much timbral presence as Rudi's best amp. After a few hours, I tried all 3 headphones again with several different discs. With two, the Sonett was clearly more pleasing and sounded more real than the Rudistor. Tonight I sat and listened to most of these CDs, classical, chamber, and live jazz, and I enjoyed the music immensely.
Now, my DNA Sonett --- hmm....model 102? --- is an honest to goodness rival to the amp I thought no other could come close to. With each CD, I want to make the comparison again and again. I think I'll just use the DNA all of the time for a while and see if I miss the SS amp for anything. The DNA doesn't even need warmup (well, a couple minutes helps!).
Nevertheless, I still had the upgrade bug lst week, maybe because it had taken so long and several delays before my DNA amp was delivered, maybe because I was disappointed at the initial SQ of the DNA amp. So,,, last week I bought a 1-yr-old Zana Deux SE from a trusted head-fi-er I had done business with before. I think of the ZD SE as sort of the Cadillac or Mercedes of tube head amps here. It will arrive next week, complete with rolling tubes. Now, I can't wait to compare my cryo'd DNA with the ZD SE. Then we'll see whether the DNA Sonett with kuhltubes really sings!!!
Then I remembered that the head-fi DNA Sonett review thread
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/493097/dna-sonett-review
suggested rolling the tubes, so I visited tubeworld.com and bought a cryo'd 1991 Russian NOS 6H30-DR Kuhltube for $175. Within 2 hr after it warmed up, the DNA headphone amp sounded fuller, cleaner, "mo' better", with much more detail and much better timbre. It really went up a notch. I listened with different headphones -- LA7000, HD800 w V3 silver dragon, Terminator (((V4))) w 600 ohm drivers -- and it was really better. I emailed Donald and congratulated him on a real world-class top-quality headphone amp.
Yet, it was no competition to the solid state, 3x more costly, Rudistor RP010B mark 2 for palpable presence - Rudi's amp is truly outstanding. So I looked at the confusing array of 5AR4/GZ34 tubes that tubeworld offers - wow, prices just keep going and going. I emailed Brenden for advice and he let me have the last cryo'd 1966 Mullard kuhltube for $220 - still in the lower third of the price range but similar to tubes mentioned here. I installed that yesterday and SHAZAM!!! The DNA became amazing - clarity, fullness, frequency extension, balance, and as much timbral presence as Rudi's best amp. After a few hours, I tried all 3 headphones again with several different discs. With two, the Sonett was clearly more pleasing and sounded more real than the Rudistor. Tonight I sat and listened to most of these CDs, classical, chamber, and live jazz, and I enjoyed the music immensely.
Now, my DNA Sonett --- hmm....model 102? --- is an honest to goodness rival to the amp I thought no other could come close to. With each CD, I want to make the comparison again and again. I think I'll just use the DNA all of the time for a while and see if I miss the SS amp for anything. The DNA doesn't even need warmup (well, a couple minutes helps!).
Nevertheless, I still had the upgrade bug lst week, maybe because it had taken so long and several delays before my DNA amp was delivered, maybe because I was disappointed at the initial SQ of the DNA amp. So,,, last week I bought a 1-yr-old Zana Deux SE from a trusted head-fi-er I had done business with before. I think of the ZD SE as sort of the Cadillac or Mercedes of tube head amps here. It will arrive next week, complete with rolling tubes. Now, I can't wait to compare my cryo'd DNA with the ZD SE. Then we'll see whether the DNA Sonett with kuhltubes really sings!!!