JaZZ
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
Think of it like that: You could easily increase the information content of DVD-Audio by a factor of 10 by increasing the sampling rate to 1,92 MHz. Would this mean any audible increase of accuracy? It's doubtable -- more likely it's a waste of data. And the latter applies in some way to DSD's ultra-high sampling rate: It's needed to achieve at least the mentioned decent amplitude resolution, but not for frequency resolution. On the other hand, a 4-bit data format with a sampling rate of 705.6 kHz (1/4 of DSD) would provide a higher amplitude resolution throughout the spectrum -- namely 9.5 bit at 16 kHz and 19 bit at 20 Hz. The ratio between usable resolution and the amount of data will become even better with even higher bit depth.
Quote:
As logical as it sounds, I wouldn't rely on this. After all there are a lot of «experts» around who think that DSD is crap and at best usable for low-fi consumer level. That said, this doesn't correspond to my listening impression at all.
Originally Posted by Ferbose ...I think PCM and DSD are just different math forms to store waveform information. Since DSD has 4x information content than 44/16 based in bits, I would surprised if DSD does not encode more information at least in some frequency band, at least mathematically. |
Think of it like that: You could easily increase the information content of DVD-Audio by a factor of 10 by increasing the sampling rate to 1,92 MHz. Would this mean any audible increase of accuracy? It's doubtable -- more likely it's a waste of data. And the latter applies in some way to DSD's ultra-high sampling rate: It's needed to achieve at least the mentioned decent amplitude resolution, but not for frequency resolution. On the other hand, a 4-bit data format with a sampling rate of 705.6 kHz (1/4 of DSD) would provide a higher amplitude resolution throughout the spectrum -- namely 9.5 bit at 16 kHz and 19 bit at 20 Hz. The ratio between usable resolution and the amount of data will become even better with even higher bit depth.
Quote:
If DSD encoding has less information and takes up more space, I am sure all the DSP experts in Philips and Sony would never put it to the market in the first place. |
As logical as it sounds, I wouldn't rely on this. After all there are a lot of «experts» around who think that DSD is crap and at best usable for low-fi consumer level. That said, this doesn't correspond to my listening impression at all.