Quote:
I wonder at the price you would pay for the HDD if it would be more worth it just to spend the money on an SSD. The power would be much less, and your seek times would be barely anything compared to a regular disk. |
Newest RunCore 128GB SSD (largest 1.8" ssd capacity at this moment) vs old Toshiba MK1214GAH (2 platters, summer 2006):
1) Price. MK1214GAH can be found for about $80; runcore one will cost you $400.
2) Weight. Runcore SSD weights about 50gms, that's 10gms less than dual-platter hdds (59gms) and nearly equal to single-platter ones (e.g. Toshiba 120GB MK1231GAL).
3) Power. Toshiba HDD consumes 1.8W at startup and 1.0-1.1W while seek/read/write; RunCore SSD consumes 1.2W while in "operation mode". RunCore SSD consumes 0.75W while idle, and, i think, this "idle" corresponds to HDD "standby" (0.12W); anyway, HDD "idle" is also low (0.4W).
So, basically, for $320 extra you will get: no noise, about 3x better protection against mechanical damage (MK1214GAH can withstand 500G while SSD can withstand 1500G), better response times and, probably,
lower battery life (ssd consumes 2-6 times more power when idle and about 10% more power when in operation mode, as opposed to HDD).
Looks like nobody cares about SSD power consumption now, they're just advertising SSDs as "power-efficient, light and fast", but reality is far from their advertisements...
PS: Just in case,
http://sdd.toshiba.com/main.aspx?Pat...Specifications ,
RunCore 128GB Pro 1.8" 8mm PATA Zif Solid State Drive SSD RunCore 128GB Pro 1.8" 8mm PATA Zif Solid State Drive SSD Detail Page