Quote:
Originally Posted by virometal /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The Bulls looked befuddled. All that confidence has been zapped by the Pistons. All I can think were the Heat really that bad?
During the reg season, I and others thought Nash should be MVP. Dirk disappears too much and imo makes the Mavs go much less than Nash drives the Suns. For me, it should of been between Nash and Bryant. I never liked the best player on best team method.
|
There's a few reasons behind the Bulls struggles and looking so good in the first round. They played an over the hill and beat up Heat team. Wade's shoulder wasn't right. Shaq is in his twilight years. Antoine Walker basically should just retire now that he has a ring, he showed he has little drive by coming into the season overweight. Posey had this same problem as well, although he might have a bit more motivation it still shows a lack of commitment. Also, the Heat were so banged up all year their chemistry was all screwed, similar to how the Lakers flopped. It's not that the Bulls aren't good, they're a nice team, but they're young and still lack inside scoring. The Pistons are a smart team, they realize how the Bulls operate and know how to stop them.
About MVP, I always think for someone to be an MVP they need to really have an impact statistically. Like Kobe scoring, Nash racking up assists, KG and Duncan being vacuums on the boards. Basically you have to lead the league in something, or at least be close. Dirk was 10th in scoring (his primary statistic), which is good, but not great. Guys like Joe Johnson, Ray Allen, and Vince Carter were ahead of him. I haven't heard any of their names in the debate, why should Dirk be there? He's not a good defender, he's average, maybe below average. Best player on the best team is a contradictory statement. Who cares who your best
player is, you're winning because your
team is good, not because of 1 guy. I agree on your Nash and Kobe comment. I give it to Nash, and Kobe a close 2nd.