jcx
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2002
- Posts
- 2,371
- Likes
- 371
level matching, blinding, positive and negative controls, multiple subjects, training sessions, ... Good audio perceptual Subjective evaluation is Hard, Expensive - and you can't establish the negative proposition that "no one" could hear something
the very least you could do is compare well established physical theory used by engineers to design the equipment and intelligently selected measurements (not THD) against the peer reviewed audio research literature on what Can be heard
when audiophile tweak component manufacturers advertisements claim physical causes that don't don't rise above the noise floor in any engineering evaluation of the system then we can save lots of our time and money by not believing them until they do scientifically acceptable DBT experiments establishing audibility
they are after all the ones with profits - and therefore motive to nail down their competitive advantage - except that human perceptual psychological and reasoning flaws make made up pseudo science and "storylines" much cheaper and more profitable
the very least you could do is compare well established physical theory used by engineers to design the equipment and intelligently selected measurements (not THD) against the peer reviewed audio research literature on what Can be heard
when audiophile tweak component manufacturers advertisements claim physical causes that don't don't rise above the noise floor in any engineering evaluation of the system then we can save lots of our time and money by not believing them until they do scientifically acceptable DBT experiments establishing audibility
they are after all the ones with profits - and therefore motive to nail down their competitive advantage - except that human perceptual psychological and reasoning flaws make made up pseudo science and "storylines" much cheaper and more profitable